OK, so I'm new at this, hi all, hi all, but I feel like I've sized up the basic situation from the way the last one went:
Krypsyn, who - incredibly who could have possibly predicted because that never happens - is Mafia. Sorry,
ex-Mafia. We'll be given a substantial pile of totally circumstantial evidence that he's guilty of killing his mollfriend. Then it's our job to pick it apart and find out that, in fact, the butler actually did it. Is that about right?
ShadowPatriarch: People choosing either "Officer on Scene, Bedroom/Bathroom" as the evidence, do reconsider opting for selecting the "Prosecution Witness, Doorman" evidence. If you opt to see this later evidence first we can establish who came and left the building and at what time, and also confirm the doorman's whereabouts at the time of the murder. Once we establish this, we can move on to gather evidence at the Bedroom/bathroom, thus providing us with a clearer view of the situation.
I agree with this,
Vote "Prosecution Witness, Doorman"