It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Krypsyn: Okay, that reply doesn't quite fit
avatar
zeogold: That depends on what he's going back to his bunk for.
Milla Jovovich, all ages inclusive. Well, the legal ones. But in Spain. Am I making this too weird? I'm making this too weird.
Milla...
avatar
sunshinecorp: Milla...
...

Heh.
Post edited February 28, 2016 by Krypsyn
avatar
sunshinecorp: Milla...
avatar
Krypsyn: ...
Yeah. She's in some pretty sucky movies...
avatar
sunshinecorp: Yeah. She's in some pretty sucky movies...
I actually bought that movie on Blu-Ray. I don't care if the plot makes no sense, or if the acting is poor; those fight scenes are awesome.
avatar
Krypsyn: I don't care if the plot makes no sense, or if the acting is poor; those fight scenes are awesome.
Huh, that's funny. People say the same thing about my court games.
Post edited February 28, 2016 by zeogold
avatar
Krypsyn: I don't care if the plot makes no sense, or if the acting is poor; those fight scenes are awesome.
avatar
zeogold: Huh, that's funny. People say the same thing about my court games.
Oh snap!
avatar
zeogold: Huh, that's funny. People say the same thing about my court games.
Heh.
Well, gonna take the risk now rather than later, as I'm rather confident in my theory. (at least enough to vote now) :P

Vote: Not Guilty


Edit: PM sent.
Post edited February 28, 2016 by Habanerose
avatar
Habanerose: Well, gonna take the risk now rather than later, as I'm rather confident in my theory. (at least enough to vote now) :P

Vote: Not Guilty
You have a theory?
avatar
Habanerose: Well, gonna take the risk now rather than later, as I'm rather confident in my theory. (at least enough to vote now) :P

Vote: Not Guilty
avatar
Maxvorstadt: You have a theory?
Yup, based on some of the details and inconsistencies revealed so far...

Doubt I can say much more without getting disqualified / breaking the rules :P
avatar
Maxvorstadt: You have a theory?
avatar
Habanerose: Yup, based on some of the details and inconsistencies revealed so far...

Doubt I can say much more without getting disqualified / breaking the rules :P
Hey, I`m your good friend, you can tell me everything!
*smiles uber-friendly*
avatar
Maxvorstadt: Hey, I`m your good friend, you can tell me everything!
*smiles uber-friendly*
Ironically, most has already been said by others earlier, small details can have sometimes major significance...
like the co-worker not mentioning the name of the boyfriend she was meeting, and the rather odd behavior of one of the people who discovered the body... so on and so forth.

Besides, it doesn't mean that it's necessarily correct, you know ;)

One of the future evidences might just completely contradict it :P


Edit: Words
Post edited February 28, 2016 by Habanerose
"Laissez-lui avoir son p'tit air de mystère..."

I think that Doorman testimony had useful tidbits but next evidence will prove richer.

REDVWIN
Post edited February 28, 2016 by REDVWIN
Vote: Not guilty

(I had a theory too. I was waiting for day 2 to be over, but since Habanerose beat me to it anyway, I might as well say it now). :(

PM on the way.

EDIT: PM sent.
Post edited February 28, 2016 by ZFR
Heh.