First off, apologies for the late reply....i've been busy with other things and also somewhat missed some threads(replies, etc)...that said:
Time4Tea: As Breja said, I don't see why it is inconsistent.
That you don't seem to want GOG to bar games due to censorship(such as Devotion), yet are seemingly ok if GOG bars other games if they're aren't a "high enough level of quality"(quality being subjective in most cases).
To me, many more games(short of things like asset flips, etc) without DRM should be able to find a home here.....and GOG should allow more onto the store and not less.....letting people buy as they will.
Time4Tea: Although I admit that 'good quality' is subjective.....
And that is partly why I don't think games should be rejected based on someone's subjective perception of a game's "level of quality".
Time4Tea: Personally, I would be in favor of GOG actively curating and removing 'bad' games from the store. In fact, I would like to see any game that gets a less than 3 verified owner score (after a certain min. number of reviews) be added to a list to be considered for removal.
This is also what I meant.....you call for GOG to not reject games like Devotion because of censorship/etc, yet say you'd be okay with things like this.