immi101: We also demanded a brutal austerity program. Which basically destroyed the greek economy.
I keep hearing that claim, but I haven't heard which were the exact reforms which "destroyed" the Greek economy, especially compared to the theoretical scenario that no bailout program would have been arranged at all, but Greece would have been left to try to cope with it alone. Would the Greeks be better off right now in that alternative scenario?
Be specific, don't just talk generally about "austerity" or "reflation", but what were the exact demands by the "troika" that destroyed the Greek economy, and what should have been done instead with that loan money that has been pushed to Greece, something that would have created much-needed sustainable economic growth.
From my point of view, the problem with Greece is that it doesn't produce enough to allow the living standards that Greeks have been accustomed to for a few decades with cheap loan money. According to Wikipedia, Greece's main exports are olive oil, olives and wine, and also tourism is an important money-bringer for them. Are those enough to let Greeks lead the way of life they were accustomed during the 2000s?
What in your eyes Greeks should have done when the crisis started, and what should they do now? Should they have declined the help by IMF, EU commission and ECB, and leave the eurozone (and probably EU at the same time) willingly already then? Or now? Why didn't they? Why does Syriza and the majority of Greeks still want to stay in the eurozone, if it is the thing killing them and causing inflexibility (which it is, as the euro value follows closer Germany than Greece)?
Note: Greece is not alone with that problem. We know Italy, Spain, France and probably many other countries are having similar issues, Finland too, just in a much milder manner at this point. We discuss here already that considering the fall of the paper industry and Nokia, the dwindling exports to Russia (for the most part due to the EU/USA sanctions, which in turn have made also Russia make some sanctions), and the aging population (=more pensioners), what standards of living can we really afford in a long run, in a sustainable ways (so that we don't leave a Greek-size debt to our grandchildren).
The thing is, we are having that discussion already before we are in IMF's leash and have matters mostly in our own hands, and while we still have a pretty good rating among the creditors. We could certainly keep increasing our debt too without much thought, but I guess the Greek situation is a good reminder to us, why we shouldn't necessarily do so.
Reflation makes more sense when the economic problems are seasonal, and not structural.