Posted December 11, 2016
GabesterOne
The Drunk Wabbit
GabesterOne Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2013
From United States
toxicTom
Big Daddy
toxicTom Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2009
From Germany
Posted December 11, 2016
Must be those lazy people Batou was talking about...
/cynism
/cynism
Klumpen0815: As someone still living in one of the majors, I can confirm this and it's getting worse every year for a long time now.
Related:
http://www.nachdenkseiten.de/upload/bilder/130222_hdt2.gif
Pretty much that :-/Related:
http://www.nachdenkseiten.de/upload/bilder/130222_hdt2.gif
Gnostic
New User
Gnostic Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2013
From Other
Posted December 19, 2016
If the unemployment rate is below 6%, why are 48 million people on food stamps?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1101/Food-stamps-why-cuts-affecting-48-million-Americans-begin-Friday
48 million in a population of 325 million is 14.77%.
Edit: the number of food stamp is 43.5 million in 2016 so 13.38% of the US population is on food stamps.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1101/Food-stamps-why-cuts-affecting-48-million-Americans-begin-Friday
48 million in a population of 325 million is 14.77%.
Edit: the number of food stamp is 43.5 million in 2016 so 13.38% of the US population is on food stamps.
Post edited December 19, 2016 by Gnostic
RWarehall
Ja'loja!
RWarehall Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2012
From United States
Posted December 19, 2016
Gnostic: If the unemployment rate is below 6%, why are 48 million people on food stamps?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1101/Food-stamps-why-cuts-affecting-48-million-Americans-begin-Friday
48 million in a population of 325 million is 14.77%.
Edit: the number of food stamp is 43.5 million in 2016 so 13.38% of the US population is on food stamps.
Simple answer...because at least 8% of the people have such shitty jobs (either part-time or low paying or both) that they still qualify for food stamps...http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1101/Food-stamps-why-cuts-affecting-48-million-Americans-begin-Friday
48 million in a population of 325 million is 14.77%.
Edit: the number of food stamp is 43.5 million in 2016 so 13.38% of the US population is on food stamps.
GabesterOne
The Drunk Wabbit
GabesterOne Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2013
From United States
Posted December 19, 2016
Gnostic: If the unemployment rate is below 6%, why are 48 million people on food stamps?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1101/Food-stamps-why-cuts-affecting-48-million-Americans-begin-Friday
48 million in a population of 325 million is 14.77%.
Edit: the number of food stamp is 43.5 million in 2016 so 13.38% of the US population is on food stamps.
Never said it was below 6%, I was responding to a comment about "no poverty here", and responding in sarcasm "Lol just like unemployment in the US is below 6%". http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1101/Food-stamps-why-cuts-affecting-48-million-Americans-begin-Friday
48 million in a population of 325 million is 14.77%.
Edit: the number of food stamp is 43.5 million in 2016 so 13.38% of the US population is on food stamps.
But I do assume that at least 8-12% of pop is unemployed right now.
Gnostic: If the unemployment rate is below 6%, why are 48 million people on food stamps?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1101/Food-stamps-why-cuts-affecting-48-million-Americans-begin-Friday
48 million in a population of 325 million is 14.77%.
Edit: the number of food stamp is 43.5 million in 2016 so 13.38% of the US population is on food stamps.
RWarehall: Simple answer...because at least 8% of the people have such shitty jobs (either part-time or low paying or both) that they still qualify for food stamps... http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1101/Food-stamps-why-cuts-affecting-48-million-Americans-begin-Friday
48 million in a population of 325 million is 14.77%.
Edit: the number of food stamp is 43.5 million in 2016 so 13.38% of the US population is on food stamps.
Post edited December 19, 2016 by GabesterOne
RWarehall
Ja'loja!
RWarehall Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2012
From United States
Posted December 19, 2016
The Bureau of Labor Statistics has 3 unemployment categories.
U3 is called the official unemployment number and as of November was 4.6%
U5 includes "discouraged and marginally attached" workers was 5.8%
U6 adds workers who are part-time "purely for economic reasons" was 9.3%
Not sure how exactly they make these distinctions, but gives an idea.
Edit: Found this...
"In the widely reported unemployment rate (U-3), the BLS only counts those who have looked for a job in the past four weeks as unemployed. They're included in the labor force because their jobless situation is only temporary.Once they haven't looked for a job in the past four weeks are no longer counted as unemployed or in the labor force. The BLS adds them to a group it calls the marginally attached. For more, see Labor Force Participation Rate.
Among them are the discouraged workers, who have given up looking for work altogether. Others have gone back to school, gotten pregnant, or have become disabled. They may or may not eventually return to the labor force, depending on their circumstances. Once they haven't looked for a job in 12 months, they're no longer counted as marginally attached.
(Source: "Definitions," Bureau of Labor Statistics.)
The BLS includes part-time workers in the employment numbers. It asks whether they would prefer a full-time job. Those people are considered underemployed.
The U-6, or real unemployment rate, includes everyone who wants a full-time job but doesn't have one.
It counts the marginally attached (including discouraged workers) and the part-timers who would prefer a full-time job. As a result, the real or true unemployment rate is much higher."
U3 is called the official unemployment number and as of November was 4.6%
U5 includes "discouraged and marginally attached" workers was 5.8%
U6 adds workers who are part-time "purely for economic reasons" was 9.3%
Not sure how exactly they make these distinctions, but gives an idea.
Edit: Found this...
"In the widely reported unemployment rate (U-3), the BLS only counts those who have looked for a job in the past four weeks as unemployed. They're included in the labor force because their jobless situation is only temporary.Once they haven't looked for a job in the past four weeks are no longer counted as unemployed or in the labor force. The BLS adds them to a group it calls the marginally attached. For more, see Labor Force Participation Rate.
Among them are the discouraged workers, who have given up looking for work altogether. Others have gone back to school, gotten pregnant, or have become disabled. They may or may not eventually return to the labor force, depending on their circumstances. Once they haven't looked for a job in 12 months, they're no longer counted as marginally attached.
(Source: "Definitions," Bureau of Labor Statistics.)
The BLS includes part-time workers in the employment numbers. It asks whether they would prefer a full-time job. Those people are considered underemployed.
The U-6, or real unemployment rate, includes everyone who wants a full-time job but doesn't have one.
It counts the marginally attached (including discouraged workers) and the part-timers who would prefer a full-time job. As a result, the real or true unemployment rate is much higher."
Post edited December 19, 2016 by RWarehall
Shadowstalker16
Jaded optimist
Shadowstalker16 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2014
From India
Posted December 26, 2016
Bumping for a nice musical work : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU33U-i7Vv8
GabesterOne
The Drunk Wabbit
GabesterOne Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2013
From United States
Posted December 26, 2016
reminds me of this famous Anita Sarkeesian quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxYyxC7gftg
Shadowstalker16
Jaded optimist
Shadowstalker16 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2014
From India
Posted December 26, 2016
GabesterOne: reminds me of this famous Anita Sarkeesian quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxYyxC7gftg
The thought process behind that quote frightens me.RWarehall
Ja'loja!
RWarehall Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2012
From United States
Posted December 26, 2016
Oh look now, the "forum regulars" are downvoting me again. Doesn't matter what I write. @fables and GoG. I hope you are watching this!
This is what is wrong with rep and the forums. You have allowed a bunch of your forumites to use rep and down-voting to intimidate and harass the other people on this forum. This is nothing but bullying and harassment.
Fuck all of you downvoters! I defy anyone to explain why post 8291 deserves to be downvoted. The only rational explanation is harassment. These are your beloved forum regulars...what nice people they are not...
This is what is wrong with rep and the forums. You have allowed a bunch of your forumites to use rep and down-voting to intimidate and harass the other people on this forum. This is nothing but bullying and harassment.
Fuck all of you downvoters! I defy anyone to explain why post 8291 deserves to be downvoted. The only rational explanation is harassment. These are your beloved forum regulars...what nice people they are not...
Vainamoinen
🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦
Vainamoinen Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2010
From Germany
Posted December 26, 2016
low rated
That's because it's all your thought process, not hers.
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3u7htz/everything_is_sexist_everything_is_racist_a_psa/
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3u7htz/everything_is_sexist_everything_is_racist_a_psa/
Rusty_Gunn
I like big bots
Rusty_Gunn Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2013
From United States
Posted December 26, 2016
GabesterOne: reminds me of this famous Anita Sarkeesian quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxYyxC7gftg
And that (Anita quote) reminds me of thisRWarehall
Ja'loja!
RWarehall Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2012
From United States
Posted December 26, 2016
Vainamoinen: That's because it's all your thought process, not hers.
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3u7htz/everything_is_sexist_everything_is_racist_a_psa/
Do you even read? https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3u7htz/everything_is_sexist_everything_is_racist_a_psa/
Even in the full quote, she doesn't say she was wrong, she just says she (supposedly) learned to hold back from telling everyone about it all the time.
"you learn how to pick and choose your battles and that sort of thing"
Does that sound like someone admitting they were wrong?
But the reality is she IS wrong. When you look for sexism, or racism, or homophobia by association, you find it where it's not. Just look at her videos. She finds it in the way avatars are dressed; she's looking at whether more or less butts are exposed; the existence of prostitutes or strip clubs in the games. Are there "enough" blacks in the videogames? Is someone trying to protect a woman? One thinks Japanese culture is completely backwards, that sort of thing...
Basically anything she can construe as sexist, racist, or homophobic is in her mind and she proves her approach in her videos. She seems incapable of looking at anything with an actual critical eye. She seems stuck on the concept that anything that can be construed as one of those things, necessarily is.
Yes, the quote is snipped, but it doesn't appear to actually be out of context...nor to not actually reflect Anita's worldview.
GabesterOne
The Drunk Wabbit
GabesterOne Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2013
From United States
Posted December 26, 2016
RWarehall: Oh look now, the "forum regulars" are downvoting me again. Doesn't matter what I write. @fables and GoG. I hope you are watching this!
This is what is wrong with rep and the forums. You have allowed a bunch of your forumites to use rep and down-voting to intimidate and harass the other people on this forum. This is nothing but bullying and harassment.
Fuck all of you downvoters! I defy anyone to explain why post 8291 deserves to be downvoted. The only rational explanation is harassment. These are your beloved forum regulars...what nice people they are not...
Lol u care about forum rep and are bitching that people disagree with your post by down reping it. Just grow up, as the rep system is very flawed on GOG and doesn't matter at all in the forums.This is what is wrong with rep and the forums. You have allowed a bunch of your forumites to use rep and down-voting to intimidate and harass the other people on this forum. This is nothing but bullying and harassment.
Fuck all of you downvoters! I defy anyone to explain why post 8291 deserves to be downvoted. The only rational explanation is harassment. These are your beloved forum regulars...what nice people they are not...
RWarehall
Ja'loja!
RWarehall Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2012
From United States
Posted December 26, 2016
RWarehall: Oh look now, the "forum regulars" are downvoting me again. Doesn't matter what I write. @fables and GoG. I hope you are watching this!
This is what is wrong with rep and the forums. You have allowed a bunch of your forumites to use rep and down-voting to intimidate and harass the other people on this forum. This is nothing but bullying and harassment.
Fuck all of you downvoters! I defy anyone to explain why post 8291 deserves to be downvoted. The only rational explanation is harassment. These are your beloved forum regulars...what nice people they are not...
GabesterOne: Lol u care about forum rep and are bitching that people disagree with your post by down reping it. Just grow up, as the rep system is very flawed on GOG and doesn't matter at all in the forums. This is what is wrong with rep and the forums. You have allowed a bunch of your forumites to use rep and down-voting to intimidate and harass the other people on this forum. This is nothing but bullying and harassment.
Fuck all of you downvoters! I defy anyone to explain why post 8291 deserves to be downvoted. The only rational explanation is harassment. These are your beloved forum regulars...what nice people they are not...
Who the heck do you think you are?
You think telling someone else to grow up is mature?
What a big man you are...
Did you read the post in question? I didn't even state an opinion at all in it. Just provided facts about various unemployment figures and it gets downrepped.
But of course you didn't read it. Instead you think insulting people on the forum is better.
Seriously, you can fuck off too!