Vainamoinen: /edit:
"
While walking to my place, I realized how drunk she was. In America, having sex with her would have been rape, since she couldn’t legally give her consent. It didn’t help matters that I was relatively sober, but I can’t say I cared or even hesitated. I won’t rationalize my actions, but having sex is what I do." ~ Daryush Valizadeh, "Bang Iceland"
(and, surprise, it was
rape in Iceland as well. D'oh).
Concerning the stuff below, in all brevity: 1) Sterling posted a review you found personally insulting. That’s all that happened.
2) You’re treating social phenomena by mathematical standards.
3.1) I consider many theories on media influence. You may still be stuck with catharsis theory in a decade.
3.2) I have the ‘right’ to present a theory without overt insecurity signifiers, and you do that all the time.
3.3) See quote above.
4.1) There is no objectivity in game reviews.
4.2) I won’t define for you what you can look up in any dictionary.
5) So they’re basing their theories on wild conjecture without corroborating evidence.
6) Tell that to the censoring parties, in this case Nintendo of America.
7) I have no idea what you are talking about.
8.1) Bombarding the primary community hub of a freshly released game with imbecile protest threads is a form of harassment.
8.2) “Gamergate” is not a group, it’s a movement that onlookers may define by many other names, say, Sad/Rabid Puppies, a movement the boundaries and morals of which are not demarcated by its supporters – not as long as they’re so proudly decentralized.
8.3) Your logical fallacies are the strawman and the slippery slope.
9) Operation Disrespectful Nod was vile harassment organized in a military fashion with the stated purpose to "effectively dismantle" several commercial websites.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/10/05/i-think-were-dealing-with-a-mob-of-twelve-year-old-boys/
10) Fruitful discourse can only bear a very limited number of purposefully ignorant.
11) Your logical fallacy is the appeal to ignorance.
12) “four extremely similar looking straight white bro dude protagonists” is an accurate description of Final Fantasy XV judging from available footage.
1.You don't understand the need for professional ethics in a job and you want to cover it up by knowingly confusing my opinion with the facts I stated.
2.You were the one said it was scientific. Science is objective. Mathematical is objective.
3.Pray mention the others then. I don't have the psychic power to recognize people's intentions and motivations from their internet fight affiliations as you do.
Using confusing language? To say that you can sell someone a car and not tell them you don't know if it works?
4.I said those terms aren't objective. You cannot make arguments without objective terms. If you use an argument like ''that is a peaceful place'' in an argument, you mean literally nothing. You're using subjective terms in an (meant to be)objective argument.
5.Can you read? I said personal example I like to quote that isn't endorsed as truth officially. The proof that it isn't can be found in the fact that we don't consider that in the op. Try not to willfully misinterpret.
6.I was talking about age ratings and tags. So sad you forgot.
7.So you said diversity is like a balance where one side needs to be tipped for the other to be equal. Then you forget that shitty as hell analogy?
8.I'm glad you defined it yourself and came out to us on behalf of the community. How many others had reached this consensus that speaking about some critic in a separate thread in which participation is optional is harassment?
And you have such hatred for an amorphous group? The original argument was that you said you personally equate anyone who disagrees with Anita as a GG supporter, and would objectively associate anyone you see as hating Anita with GG. Good to see you're trying to get the fuck away from that little brainfart by changing the topic.
Why don't you stop labeling fallacies and look at your own faults? You say I strawman, but you change what you're talking about in every post, and cover up your own lack of understanding by attributing my feelings to facts I stated.
9.Nice of you to quote an opinion blog. I'm entirely convinced you have no idea of what the difference between facts and opinions are, and that only you pick those you agree with. I'm entirely convinced it was ''vile [citation needed] harassment [citation needed] organized in military fashion [citation needed] with stated[citation needed] of ''effectively dismantling'' several commercial websites.''
So I take your answer to be ''Its activism when we get a guy fired over racism but its harassment when people contact advertisers with objective proof of ethical violations from their advertising partners.''
10.I wouldn't say you're an authority.
11.You accuse, you need to prove. If you can't, GTFO.
12.And that makes them less of an enemy? Not that you need any opposition to brand something as an enemy to your cause.
dtgreene: 1. You are confusing the issue here.
Gender and Gender Identity are the same thing. Sexual orientation is not.
I think you need to look at the genderbread person again:
http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/
2. What about games that have an RPG character creation system, but still force you to play a male character? (Eschalon Book 1 comes to mind here.)
3. There is plenty of evidence. From a simple Google search:
http://www.bu.edu/news/2015/02/13/review-article-provides-evidence-on-the-biological-nature-of-gender-identity/
http://transascity.org/the-transgender-brain/
Quotes mess up so I numbered them.
1.Yes I did, my mistake. That website is blog like. I don't buy their theory, but what you said was correct.
2.If the story somehow makes it that way, like if all women were banned from fighting or the armor is too heavy for females or literally anything in anyone imagination, then I'm ok with it. I'm not concerned about choice here, all I want is to allow the original vision of the artist to exist without getting bullied into censorship. If the vision is that males were all shrunk down 3 feet and couldn't fight, I'd be okay with only having female character creation too.
3.Article is about article that states there may be biological basis for gender and gender dysphoria (duh). I was speaking in general terms. Ie, if there is evidence for what people say. I knew already there was biological basis, so no revelation there.