Shadowstalker16: Some additional concerns:
Why don't SJWs rage against real persecution of LGBTQ people?
Why do SJWs think they are fit to decide what everyone else can see if they can't handle something like a rape scene in a TV show and doing so disturbs their mental equilibrium into such a tizzy as for them to get so distressed as has happened in the The MarySue GoT thingy or the Quiet action figure outrage? If they are so easily set off, they're not good for society, and that's a fact. Its like putting a rabid monkey in charge of the drinking water supply.
dragonbeast: If you are triggered (which means you have a real mental episode with severe effects like hyperventilation, and i mean not breathing a bit heavy, i mean veritable hyperventilation) THAT easily, you cannot expect the entire world to remove all somewhat offensive things.
You need therapy and probably medication that suppresses extreme and dangerous reactions by minor events
(They want r*pe to get more attention, yet when it appears in an extremely violent tv show they all freak out.)
Since there appears to be a distinct lack of any moderation whatsoever and that RW person seemed to get a free pass...
Go fuck yourself. "They want r*pe to get more attention" is fucking farcical. Beyond farcical even.
Its farcicality is excessive to the point that no living being may possibly even conceive of the true extent of its farcical nature.
Oh, and it's also a really shitty fucking scummy thing to say about a group of people whose reaction tends to actually stem from having experienced sexual assault (including rape).
How about recognising that there's a massive fucking difference between 'Those who have experienced sexual assault need greater support' and a fucking rape scene in a TV show renowned for its focus on naked women and sex.
Or is that too great a fucking cognitive feat for you to accomplish that you must resign yourself to maintaining dissonance and making ridiculous assertions with no basis in reality?
(& seriously. 'Hyperventilation' is your fucking definitive symptom for PTSD?
Really? Don't know how bloody many people you know with PTSD, but I'd actually be willing to bet it's somewhere in the region of fucking zero.)
Bonus points:
Medication does fuck all for PTSD. Most people with PTSD (or related disorders) that can access therapy are going through therapy.
This thread is funnily e-fucking-nough not about shitting on those with mental illnesses, nor is it remotely related to dismissing the mentally ill or disabled people on the basis of their affliction as if it makes them less important.
So mayyybe you could try not being a shriveled sphincter demonstrating complete ignorance of both mental illness and the medical treatment thereof.
Oh, and of course the nail in the proverbial coffin of your stupendous shitstreak of a stance:
Most people with PTSD aren't asking that shit be banned or censored or anything of the sort.
They just want some fucking respect and tend to figure that a warning might be nice. (Although of course some people
would like particularly shitty treatment of sensitive issues to go the fuck away, but that's in the approximate realm of wanting actual literal Nazis to fuck off too.
It's of no benefit to anyone and merely furthers harm to already-suffering subsections of society.
Again: Is rape really the fucking hill people want to die on?
Because I honestly can't see how defending shitty writing that relies overly much on the shock value of abuse & rape is going to reflect well on anyone.)
Oh, and one final 'protip' :
CRITICISM IS NOT CENSORSHIP. Free speech, etc.
Something something free markets.
(Libertarians and Republicans love that shit, right?
Except, apparently, when the market doesn't do as they'd like and complains that things are shit and should stop being shit or suffer appropriate consequences like complete and utter failure.)
Shadowstalker16: snip...
Anyhow, I'm trying to increase rep-talk tolerance. Anyone willing to bleed can join in.
Brasas: I'm already quixotic enough...
Blatant lies.
You have a
positive rep'. :P