I would listen and would be glad if he would actually have done his homework for once.
I even uprepped your downvoted posts although we didn't agree in those, because I think you have good intentions (but just another base of information), not like this other guy here who again picked the one link from someone he doesn't like and discredits the whole article without any argument while making the rest disappear in his quote so he can attack again without any distractions.
(I only know this one article on reaxxion tbh and my opinion on one article isn't changed by others on the same site.)
This guy is simply destructive and the reason for dozens of lost rep (not only mine) in this thread for sure, he(?)/she/whatever would do anything to try to silence his opposition, because he doesn't mean well, he just means war, even in such a petty topic.

better to analyse every individual post case by case.

(hell, i even praised brianna wu for showing some openness recently by talking to Brad and feline freq without attacking them. Brianna f-ing wu!)

Yeah, it warmed my heart to see how positive everyone on the #gg side took the sudden peaceful approach of Brianna Wu, one of their arch enemies. It was quite sad to see how the other side reacted of course, but whatever...

Oh right, you mean this heart warming, positive reaction from "everyone"? etc.

im calm im down

im kinda over it now but...

tnanks for the mansplanations (jk) ;P

i guess it just shows you shouldna play with ya code!! :-O

no offence but...

youre in forum hell

just curious why do you do it

I'd be more questioning of bad comments on a person's appearance when she is confirmed to have accidentally started a thread on her game's greenlight page she intended to create with another account to bash herself and cry hate. And people in general are transphobic. You're being led to believe its only people who play games who are like that.

How fitting. Vaina posted a lot of supposed quotes from random accounts on the internet without any mention of the sources whatsoever in which (apart from the usual internet trolling) it is stated, that Wu is dishonest for calling himself a woman and then you post about an accidentally proven dishonest action to be a professional victim at Greenlight. Care to link some source?

Fresh from the horse's mouth:
http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/911071-gamergate

You're absolutely right. Here's solid proof (its an image; not an article; so don't be afraid to click the reaxxion link) : http://www.reaxxion.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/B9XBXrBCEAAIxhj.jpg
Better yet; archive: https://archive.today/t1Oxl

Forum wouldn't take my edits. You can find ALL THOSE those specific quotes under the respective reaxxion WaWu meetup article, linked by yourself earlier. Please understand that I won’t link to extremely prominent gamergate hate outlets, simple googling will suffice.

And however violent downvotes for simple truth get on this forum, this is the reaction you easily find on every gamergate news outlet.

Here's a really small sample from the comments on the WaWu meetup article from the Ralph Retort site, demonstrating again how positive everyone on the #gg side took the sudden peaceful approach of Brianna Wu.

Everyone, mind you. Everyone. ...

I could go on for a dozen pages with that stuff. There’s no end and no moderation.

Seeing all that peaceful positivity, oh em gee. I think I have something in my eye.

I do agree that saying "everyone" is silly as it's extremely unlikely that "everyone" in a specific group will share the same opinions and have the same behavior.

But I couldn't help but smile at the wonderful hypocrisy of having you, out of all people, making this kind of remarks. :)

Well firstly of course I don't believe that the first-hand accounts of Elizabeth Fogerty are objective facts because ALL first-hand accounts, almost by their very definition, are not objective - they are a testimony from one perspective through one set of subjective human eye

I found this on wikipedia about subjective reality:
"Subjective experience can involve a state of individual subjectivity, perception on which one builds one's own state of reality; a reality based on one’s interaction with one's environment. The subjective experience depends on one’s individual ability to process data, to store and internalize it. For example: our senses collect data, which we then process according to biological programming (genetics), neurological network-relationships and other variables such as relativity etc., all of which affect our individual experience of any given situation in such a way as to render it subjective"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience#Subjective

And *I* didn't bring up anything Tza brought up Elliot Rodger here
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/the_gamergate_news_thread/post2453
because he didn't like that Anita had tweeted that there must be something fundamentally wrong with the way that masculinity is expressed in our society that makes this sort of thing happen
It's not that I can't see why she got some people's backs up by saying that but it seemed a little one sided to not remind everyone of the sheer scale of the misogynistic hate, not just from Rodger himself but from some of the Incels who backed him and blamed society for his deeds that she was saying it in the face of.

While dragonbeast brought up IS and Al-Queda here:
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/the_gamergate_news_thread/post2461
Saying that ooh - you'd blame masculinity for Rodger but you wouldn't blame Islam for IS
And I said, coincidentally that, reading that Incel extremist's rant it did remind me of something a 'Radicalised' Muslim would post right before shipping off to Syria to sign up and help create the society of his wet dreams, so there's a 'masculinity' angle to ISIS too

But you're right in that I am allowing others to lead me Off Topic, I kind of lost sense of where I found myself trying to lead the thread and why, myself to be honest! So sorry about that at least!

I never meant to do any 'taring everyone with the same brush' type business though, and having had the accusation made against me I will take any further cries against anyone else with an even bigger pinch of salt than before...

Everyone who COMMENTED. And again; when is this a gamergate issue? Do you think people who watch 5 movies a week are any different? AND keep in mind a fair percentage of those guys are probably Wu with smurf accounts.

let me tell you something out of personal experience.
Insults from your enemies are something you can expect at every turn and frankly, it doesn't hit that hard. When the insults come from your allies and "buddies" however, every hit will feel like a mike tyson punch.

I can absolutely guarantee you that.

"a hundred insults or punches from your enemies will never hurt as much as a single one from your friends."

It was to be expected some in gg would react negatively vs Wu. She is on the opposing team after all. She claimed we would gas pax and poisoned her dog and painted GG like HellSpawn, so i'm not surprised people within gg carry a grudge against her. And in general, I've not seen that destructive attacks on the concept of her meetup with Wa. At the same time i've also seen the meeting recieved as something positive. And notice that on the feline frequency comment, no gg acted harmful, yet one SJW was beginning its attack.

Notice how noone is screaming horrible insults at Brad, our side, for meeting with Wu.

Yet the antigg have done a MASSIVE attack on Wu, their representative. and these people were not her enemies, these were her allies. In a war you can expect the enemy to shoot at you, but you won't expect your own platoon to open fire on you.
And I've seen some downright horrible things said by her allies.

i'm fairly certain there were a lot of hate posts vs Brad on the antis side too, just like anti wu on the pro end. But gg did not condemn the idea of meeting with the enemy. The antis destroyed the idea.