My two cents...
I understand where the OP is coming from, as I'm not really thrilled about GOG nowadays. I'm a collector, so I buy most of the games offered by GOG, whenever I consider the price to be adequate -as I'm not really going play most of them-. The ones that I might, though, are point&click adventure games, puzzle platformers, classic old school rpgs -if only they weren't so long- and some indie games I might consider interesting. Therefore, I'm into preservation, and not really into comercial standard gameplay.
So all the rejection information, and the fact that my preferred genre is too niche for gog, means they don't cater to my needs anymore. Which is kind of disheartening. And unfortunately it's my impression that it's all a consequence of the recent comercial success of the store, with witcher3 and all the new users that brought and are more into new comercial games, and the betthesda games. Yes, GOG is a business, but I don't think earning lots of money was the purpose behind it; as the DRM-Free model + old classic games were never going to get them there. And I've always been happy to consider them champions of game preservation. But maybe the business plan is shifting.
All in all, the bottom line is that I was happier when it was up the companies that games were missing, as there was always the possibility of being released here at a later time. But when GOG themselves are not interested in the games you want, well, that's a different matter altogether. I can't just imagine the amount of backlash that would show up had they rejected the "beloved" bethesda games. Many people would have probably left GOG altogether because of that. Some other people might feel that way about some other games...
