CharlesGrey: That said, I don't approve of their questionable business shenanigans, either. When you develop a game with the aid of crowd-funding, and rely on the trust of your supporters, you don't do a 180 and sign a deal with a traditional AAA publisher halfway through the development process. I doubt many would have donated to the campaign, knowing that it's a Gearbox or Microsoft production.
no offense meant (not to you, inf act..) but.. .are you new on this planet ?
i mean, within the last 2 years, there had been MANY crowdfunded projects that went exactly that way. I happen tobe the unhappy (but finally refunded through legal threats) backer of such a not that uncommon disaster:
- Be me
- See ulule campaign for 2dark, the upcoming game of famous french game designer Frederic Reynal (1st alone in the dark, toy commander, etc) for PC
- Contact campaign manager to ask about non steam release of game
- Manager confirms me by written ways that campaign backers will receive a DRM Free build of final release of game
- Campaign ends, game funded, and basically game dev team go DARK and silent for a couple of year (barely any notification of progress or such)
- At release, game is published by some casual industry shark, is released on PC and consoles, is Steam only on PC but ALSO get denuvo added in
- Inquires about all that to some representative and get laughed at, claiming the abandon of promised drm free build and addition of infamous denuvo only raised marginal number of complains (like, a handful of angry people)
- Many non french articles on various websites and forum about this betrayal on internet rather prooves otherwise (aka: "it is not marginal small handful number of angry backers)
- Request refund and get answered that game key was delivered
- Be glad that game dev team is based in my country so i remind them a few things about CURRENT legislation regarding customer laws and contractual code...
- Finally get refunded
- Game gets its denuvo shit cracked in less than a month
- Gloat maniacally
And i wont even mention another case like the game Riot: Civil Unrest, it is a rather "cool" salty infuriating story as well....
But i admit that We happy few raised the ante quite high with the way gearbox simply messed up the whole thing... (collector edition of the game... without the actual game... priceless joke)
Sarasa: Those of us that bought in the past the In-dev version, are we receiving only the basic version or will it be upgraded later ?
i_hope_you_rot: If you Kickstarted the game then you get the Season Pass for free. If not you have to buy it .
Fact is, the question is valid and remain unanswered...
Purchasing the game as in its "indev" version on GOG is different from backing the game during KS campaign.
So, yes, question is: "do GOG customers who purchased the game while it was still in a In-Dev status will get treated as if they were kickstarter backers and thus would get season pass for free, OR will they just be second-class customers again ?"
(also, keep in mind such kind of decision is not in GOG's hands, publisher would decide how to treat such customers on GOG the same as if they were backers on KS, or not)
My spider senses are tingling and i could safely bet that... NO... we here wont get season pass for free... but hey, i could be proven wrong :)