rjbuffchix: I also don't want anything to do with Supraland 2 after the dev originally brought Supraland 1 here only to then not support it, to the point it got removed from this store. Those of us who bought it here in hopes of supporting an interesting new indie game were then left holding the bag with an abandoned game and unless we had maybe backed it on Kickstarter, had no way of getting a refund that late after the fact. Why in the hell should GOG even look in the general direction of the sequel!!?
TZODnmr2k5: I never knew this, otherwise I would not have given that Dev the time of day, thanks for the info, I also did some digging and found
this thread; apparently GoG held off on giving them a same day release so when they finally green lit it he did not make as much after allowing him to finally bring the game over here...
So he took his game and left, which was still petty as there were already people that bought the game, yeah, I won't be officially getting that sequel after all!
MarkoH01: Oh yes, let's hope for a game of a dev that basically treated GOG and their customers like crap and then even refused to bring the DLC of Supraland to GOG - instead he pulled the base game from the store. Sorry, but no thanks. Publishers and devs who behaved like this should not be welcomed here again ... and I doubt they even want to, so not much GOG could do anyway.
TZODnmr2k5: Yeah, I did some reading up on that Dev, and I now know that I won't be supporting his highness in the least!
Random and unrelated, but you are as of now Leet.
You should freeze your rep ;)
Mean TZO, answered to the wrong person sorrz
Ancient-Red-Dragon: Many Puritans bash literally every single AO game that GOG releases, without fail.
That means that even if some of them
are bad games, it would still be impossible to determine that from the Puritans' comments, given that they always "cry wolf" for all AO games.
So I'm going to go with the assumption that all AO games which GOG releases are masterpieces. Even if they aren't, that's probably closer to the truth than is the Puritans' (who never even have played any AO games) claim that they are all trash.
marcob: No bias-based or morality-based impression...still, judging by the screenshots and presentation, it looks amateurish, bland, not so innovative to balance its basic looks. Plus, it says 18+, mature, with adult banner (so it's not, say, the visibly excellent "Vampire Bloodlines", which has aged beautifully and, I suppose, is 18+ because of gore and horror plot, but it's adult). Cople this with the protagonist being provided with "+5 twin bouncers of doom" and you can easily predict why it's 18+ even without other clues, and where the only quality/selling point is. Too much adult games in a short time? Maybe. Too much rushed adult games that probably use "adult" as an excuse for being shallow? I fear so.
Are we talking about the Vampire Bloodlines that was broken beyond believe and never fixed by the devs till the fans stepped in ?
You know the big goal but amateurish execution one ?
I mean I love the game to death but that was one hell of a broken release and if I judged it just from what I saw at release I wouldn't have touched it with a 10 foot pole.
(I still prefer Redemption actually though)
I mean I'm not saying this release here is a great game, I'm saying I have no clue if it is, I'm not interested enough to try but I sure wouldn't go around and judge.
You're basically dismissing the game on the same grounds that people went apeshit about the excellent Dragon's Crown.
I mean if you want to try there is ways, wink.