It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Girls just wanna have fun.

Shining Song Starnova is now available DRM-free on GOG.com.

They may harbor dark secrets, insecurities, bad habits, the works. At the end of the day, though, these are seven young ladies, simply dreaming big in an industry where dreams don't come cheap. As the Producer, your job is to approach these talented singers, get to know them, then help them reach their full potential.

Pick up the Soundtrack and Vocal Collection separately or grab them together with the main game in the Limited Edition.

For more extravagant action and emotional adventures, check out our special Japanese Sale with games up to 80% off until August 1st, 10pm UTC.
avatar
MarkoH01: If it is in fact the same version I have no problem. The problem I have is that the facebook post sounds as if GOG ... and only GOG ... has asked for ADDITIONAL edits. It's a principle I don't want to support - this has nothing to do wuith the game or what is missing or can be re-edited. As I said - it's a principle thing.
Marko, I think it's a misunderstanding. It's more like, the publisher submits a full, raw and explicit version to GOG, since GOG is not automatic like Steam, and has a vastly more manual process. Thereafter, GOG simply tells them directly which parts are the ones that needs to be patched up. So, it ends up sounding like an "additional edit" but it actually isn't. The game is no different from the Steam version. The "additional edits" just means the game has been "touched/altered" from the original, thus it's "additional".
Post edited July 27, 2018 by Nicole28
avatar
MarkoH01: If it is in fact the same version I have no problem. The problem I have is that the facebook post sounds as if GOG ... and only GOG ... has asked for ADDITIONAL edits. It's a principle I don't want to support - this has nothing to do wuith the game or what is missing or can be re-edited. As I said - it's a principle thing.
avatar
Nicole28: Marko, I think it's a misunderstanding. It's more like, the publisher submits a full, raw and explicit version to GOG, since GOG is not automatic like Steam, and has a vastly more manual process. Thereafter, GOG simply tells them directly which parts are the ones that needs to be patched up. So, it ends up sounding like an "additional edit" but it actually isn't. The game is no different from the Steam version. The "additional edits" just means the game has been "touched/altered" from the original, thus it's "additional".
This would in fact change things drastically for me. So the devs did not offer GOG the censored but the uncensored version which GOG could not sell here without any cuts because of the implicit content. It was my understanding that devs of visual novels with explicit content usually make two different versions and that they sell the censored version to other stores so it did not occur to me that they could have offered GOG the uncensored version in this case. If this would be the case it was in fact all a misunderstanding.
Post edited July 27, 2018 by MarkoH01
avatar
Sabin_Stargem: The decision of what is important should be decided by the person in question. A parent's duty to their child is to ensure that they have a safe environment and the means to obtain an ideal life. Denying knowledge and resources is among the many things a parent can do to ruin a person's life.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Are you trying to tell us that this game - portraying full-on pornography in a "casting couch" situation as girls / young women try to make their way in the music industry - is suitable "knowledge and resources" for healthy sexual education to adolescents?

Taking out that content, or allowing it behind an age verification wall, isn't repressing sexuality. The game is certainly not an example that I would want a teen to learn from: using a position of power to coerce / convince girls and young women to have sex. Once the kid / young adult has figured out sexuality - with parental guidance - through the confusion of the changes of adolescence and peer / societal influences, then let them at it. But I don't feel that type of content is conducive to teaching them healthy sexual and relationship behaviors. Let them get past the crazy hormone and learning stages, first. I'm not saying the content shouldn't be available. Just that it's not appropriate for all ages, and it's far from being a learning tool, except of the "Don't do it this way" type.
Exactly. Porn presents sexuality as something "dirty", selfish, and violent, and this is supposed to be liberating???
Post edited July 27, 2018 by richlind33
It's probably best to buy the uncensored version directly at MangaGamer:

https://www.mangagamer.com/detail.php?goods_type=1&product_code=1072
avatar
Impaler26: It's probably best to buy the uncensored version directly at MangaGamer:

https://www.mangagamer.com/detail.php?goods_type=1&product_code=1072
Or buy it here and apply the 18+ patch if that's your bag.

My issues stemmed from at the time the patch hadn't been updated for the full 1.00 release - it was still for the beta... the updated patch has seen no issues from me thus far (only played through one route so far but initial issue was in the prologue . 1st chapter of the game.
avatar
richlind33: Exactly. Porn presents sexuality as something "dirty", selfish, and violent, and this is supposed to be liberating???
The fact that you automatically assume that porn is rooted in malevolence, makes it clear that you lack experience. As with traditional offerings, there is a spectrum of quality, genre, and presentation.


Anyhow, you are not considering the useful applications beyond fulfilling lust. For example: by trying out various types of porn, a person can figure out which gender(s) and activities they are attracted to. This knowledge would make it easier for them to eventually find the partner right for them.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Let me put it this way: if my 12-yera old niece goes to the video store, do you think she should find Debbie Does Dallas on the shelves between, say, Dear John and Eloise?

Neither do I
avatar
Sabin_Stargem: Considering how violence is given a trivial pass in the media, I have no objection against sex being just as casual and ordinary. Debbie Does Dallas deserves just as prominent a place as Gojira, Mad Max, Frozen, and Citizen Kane.
Exactly. I will never understand people who think that violence and killing, i.e. the ending of life, is OK. But the creation of life, i.e. sex, is evil. That is a very twisted morality!
avatar
Sabin_Stargem: Considering how violence is given a trivial pass in the media, I have no objection against sex being just as casual and ordinary. Debbie Does Dallas deserves just as prominent a place as Gojira, Mad Max, Frozen, and Citizen Kane.
avatar
Lifthrasil: Exactly. I will never understand people who think that violence and killing, i.e. the ending of life, is OK. But the creation of life, i.e. sex, is evil. That is a very twisted morality!
Two things:

Who said sex was evil?

I daresay that the portrayal of sex in this game has anything to do with the creation of life. It looks more like an exercise of power through sex.
avatar
richlind33: Exactly. Porn presents sexuality as something "dirty", selfish, and violent, and this is supposed to be liberating???
avatar
Sabin_Stargem: The fact that you automatically assume that porn is rooted in malevolence, makes it clear that you lack experience. As with traditional offerings, there is a spectrum of quality, genre, and presentation.

Anyhow, you are not considering the useful applications beyond fulfilling lust. For example: by trying out various types of porn, a person can figure out which gender(s) and activities they are attracted to. This knowledge would make it easier for them to eventually find the partner right for them.
I make no assumptions. Erotica per se isn't wicked or "sinful"; the people who produce and distribute pornography, however, are crude and misogynistic. Yes, there are exceptions, but they are few and far between.
I love pornography.

If that makes me an evil person fine, I'll just add it to the list. :P
Just for grins,here's the developer's website: http://sunrider-vn.com/

Try entering the site by putting in your age as a 17-year old whose 18th birthday is tomorrow. Seems even the developer feels there should be an age wall.
avatar
Lifthrasil: Exactly. I will never understand people who think that violence and killing, i.e. the ending of life, is OK. But the creation of life, i.e. sex, is evil. That is a very twisted morality!
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Two things:

Who said sex was evil?
The moral guardians of the USA, for example. The portrayal of sex is something bad. Children have to be 'protected' from that. But killing people is completely fine. Violence is fun! A naked breast on Facebook has to be deleted. But clips from some action movie with people being badly wounded or killed - thats perfectly acceptable.

It even goes into the cartoon area. Cartoon violence ... well, that's not to be taken serious, is it? It's just fun! But cartoon sex? Oh no! How horrible! That has to be censored!

All in all a certain part of the US society seems to be very afraid of sex, but totally OK with violence (especially with gun-violence). And that is a very sick morality in my eyes.
avatar
tinyE: I love pornography.

If that makes me an evil person fine, I'll just add it to the list. :P
You'd better get a firearm, tinyE. In case someone tries to take your pron away. ;p
avatar
Lifthrasil: All in all a certain part of the US society seems to be very afraid of sex, but totally OK with violence (especially with gun-violence). And that is a very sick morality in my eyes.
Hmm, I can understand how one might come to that opinion. But I don't look at the two - sex and violence - as being anywhere near the same thing in our lives.

Here's why I think it's different: you're going to get laid, but you're not going to kill someone. If we want our kids to grow up with a decent sexual foundation, I don't think it's a good idea for them to learn from "gonzo" videos, unrealistic cartoon sex, games where the goal is to use sex to control others, and any other number of sources that focus on degradation, power and control, and the money shot. And especially at a point in their lives when the body and mind are undergoing sexual changes and are most open to outside influences.

The same doesn't happen with violence. There is no puberty for murderous thoughts. The typical 15-year old guy might get a boner for no particular reason, but he's not going to get this daily urge to beat the crap out of someone just for kicks. Violent media isn't going to have the same effect on him because his body changes aren't focused on that thing, whereas those changes with adolescence are highly focused on sexual maturity.

In other words, I don't think that violence in media is creating any more unrealistic expectations in that regard as, say, space movies are giving us unrealistic expectations about, well, outer space. Mostly because we're not going to be murderers, and we're not going into outer space. But we are most likely going to get lucky. Hopefully with someone we love and care for. Hopefully many times. And hopefully the kids won't be emulating those things they see in much of this commercial content, at least not before putting that content in proper perspective. Given that puberty is such a messed-up time already, it's altogether possible that the wrong content can damage one's long-term love and sex life by creating unhealthy expectations.

Anyway, that's a long way of saying that violent media can have a negative influence on something you're not going to ever do, whereas sexual content media can have a negative influence on something you'll hopefully be doing many times over the course of your life. So I'd prefer to make a little bit higher hurdle for our kids to consume the types of commercial pornography that dominate the industry these days.

-----

Does anyone else think this release thread got kinda weird?
A new Shining game from Sega? Yay!

Oooooo it's a different type of Shining game...