It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Locked in a timeless conflict.

Massive Chalice, a kickstarter-born Double Fine strategy, is available 20% off, on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux, DRM-free on GOG.com!

A 300 year war draws near, your people need a leader. Massive Chalice is a turn-based strategy game that spans hundreds of years and outlives generations of fighters. It's a desperate fight where every advantage matters, and a strong bloodline is the greatest one you'll get. No human is perfect, but with careful planning you can breed and design the perfect army which complements itself like sophisticated puzzle. Family matters, so take good care of a young generation and they'll reward you with their lives - through valiant fight their weapons will become Bloodline Relics to be passed on to aid their children in the struggle. Massive Chalice requires you to plan for years and years ahead, as the Immortal Ruler of a nation locked in epic conflict.

As an added bonus, you can pick up the Original Soundtrack for Massive Chalice, also 20% off. Play it on repeat for 300 years!

Forge heroic bloodlines in Massive Chalice, available now, DRM-free on GOG.com.
avatar
YaTEdiGo: Exactly.

I think just because Tim Schaffer has an opinion his work or even his whole team should not be judged for this, right? Many of the ones that criticize Double Fine for this maybe later see conspiracies in the criticism to Destructive Creations guys...
avatar
Reaper9988: You're right it shouldn't and I hope that none of the proffessional reviews of the game take Tim Schafers opinion into account one way or the other.

But as a customer for a luxury product I can definitely decide whom I want to spend money on by any subjective reasons I feel fit.
I guess so.
avatar
Lodium: Donations are free from tax but strangly enough Kickstarter is considered as a shop and kickstarter themself are complying to the rules/laws that you shoud pay vat on purchase.
Nothing strange about it. Frankly, KS has become a preorder service much more than a donation stand. You give money in exchange of a service or a good. As far as I know, French law sees it as a purchase too.
2 hours of Massive Chalice played, you can watch the VOD here:
http://www.twitch.tv/gogcom/v/5841102
Enjoy!
avatar
Lodium: Interesting points indeed but
im not against tax.
But the politicians spend the money in the wrong places and also squander quite a bit of money on useless stuff.
Forexample, Norway has given a lot of aid to corrupt or oppressive regimes.
Another time they rented a building over 2 years but no one was using the building.
Some of them also have a pretty high sallary wich results that some citizens feels inferior.
Politicians are kind of the elites like the nobles was before the french revolution.
They grant themself payrise each time the politician sallary is up for discussion in the senate but at the same time they cut pensions for elderly people.

The politicians here are kind of like the ones you find in the EU.
They are disconnected from the people they are suposed to rule and like to talk big withouth doing anything useful.

Besides Goverments/states can never get enough taxes because there is always some good cause to use it on.
The answer isnt always to raise taxes or invent new ones.
Hmm
Maybe im going a bit too offtopic now.
It's complicated, I guess. In theory, I think taxes could be used to provide a secure baseline for minimum human dignity and protection from violence and theft, and equalizing opportunity for people who otherwise would've had very little chance to do well in life because class mobility is pretty naturally low. I don't doubt that in real life, governments come way short of doing that and waste a lot of money. If I knew how to fix it, I would say how.

Anyway, it's somewhat off topic because if the real issue is whether taxes are good or not in the first place, then a discussion about whether Kickstarter counts as charity isn't really what you're looking for.
avatar
mothwentbad: It's complicated, I guess. In theory, I think taxes could be used to provide a secure baseline for minimum human dignity and protection from violence and theft, and equalizing opportunity for people who otherwise would've had very little chance to do well in life because class mobility is pretty naturally low. I don't doubt that in real life, governments come way short of doing that and waste a lot of money. If I knew how to fix it, I would say how.

Anyway, it's somewhat off topic because if the real issue is whether taxes are good or not in the first place, then a discussion about whether Kickstarter counts as charity isn't really what you're looking for.
But woudnt too much tax kill the willingnes to invest or donate money?
Say i win 10 milions.
Then i can use some of these money to either invest and then get a return on my investement
or i can donate money to somone that are willing to start up something withouth expecting a return
the only thing i then woud expect is a thank you.
You cant really tax thank you and im seeing the rewards on kickstarter as a thank you if whatever i helped get going by my donation.

The people that donated to occulus rift got that going and got a rift as thank you
Occulus rift is now paying taxes and their workers are also paying taxes.
woud all this happen withouth those donations?
Post edited June 06, 2015 by Lodium
avatar
mothwentbad: It's complicated, I guess. In theory, I think taxes could be used to provide a secure baseline for minimum human dignity and protection from violence and theft, and equalizing opportunity for people who otherwise would've had very little chance to do well in life because class mobility is pretty naturally low. I don't doubt that in real life, governments come way short of doing that and waste a lot of money. If I knew how to fix it, I would say how.

Anyway, it's somewhat off topic because if the real issue is whether taxes are good or not in the first place, then a discussion about whether Kickstarter counts as charity isn't really what you're looking for.
avatar
Lodium: But woudnt too much tax kill the willingnes to invest or donate money?
Say i win 10 milions.
Then i can use some of these money to either invest and then get a return on my investement
or i can donate money to somone that are willing to start up something withouth expecting a return
the only thing i then woud expect is a thank you.
You cant really tax thank you and im seeing the rewards on kickstarter as a thank you if whatever i helped get going by my donation.

The people that donated to occulus rift got that going and got a rift as thank you
Occulus rift is now paying taxes and their workers are also paying taxes.
woud all this happen withouth those donations?
Donations are a fine thing and can make the world better. Kickstarter is rather complicated and really has to be thought of as a donation-purchase hybrid to be used with caution.

Taxes for, say, single-payer health care is something I can get behind. I don't think you should have to cross your fingers and hope for donations or walk around with a change bucket after work every day if you get diabetes or whatever else. I think that's a good use of tax dollars. (Education and preventative care is of course cheaper when it works, so that's also something I can support). And if governments spend wisely, the money stays in the economy - if I'm not spending my money on a chronic health condition to the point where I'm constantly on the border of poverty, then I can donate to cool causes or whatever.

There's room in the world for both donations and taxes IMO, but both can go wrong - charities screw things up just as much as governments, and Kickstarters can flop and waste money. I don't think taxes should buy big screen TVs or anything close to that, but I'm ok with the government, say, making really cheap housing and letting people work for their booze, TVs, fancy cars, and fine chocolates.

The Rift looks like it might be a very fine device. Sometimes governments pay for R&D through the university system, but that's also got its problems, and demonstrably, crowd funding sometimes picks up gaps where the government has a blind spot. I think there is plenty of room for both, and if governments could be wise in where they invest money, there would still be money left over for individuals to invest. I don't really take issue with the fact that Kickstarting a VR device isn't tax-deductible like a donation to MSF. MSF is an amazing organization, and if anything, other charities should lose their exemption status if they waste their funds too much.
avatar
Piranjade: 2 hours of Massive Chalice played, you can watch the VOD here:
http://www.twitch.tv/gogcom/v/5841102
Enjoy!
Thank you Piranjade!
avatar
Lodium: Interesting points indeed but
im not against tax.
But the politicians spend the money in the wrong places and also squander quite a bit of money on useless stuff.
Forexample, Norway has given a lot of aid to corrupt or oppressive regimes.
Another time they rented a building over 2 years but no one was using the building.
Some of them also have a pretty high sallary wich results that some citizens feels inferior.
Politicians are kind of the elites like the nobles was before the french revolution.
They grant themself payrise each time the politician sallary is up for discussion in the senate but at the same time they cut pensions for elderly people.

The politicians here are kind of like the ones you find in the EU.
They are disconnected from the people they are suposed to rule and like to talk big withouth doing anything useful.

Besides Goverments/states can never get enough taxes because there is always some good cause to use it on.
The answer isnt always to raise taxes or invent new ones.
Hmm
Maybe im going a bit too offtopic now.
Well if we are off topic I think universally politicians are pretty much the same globally. They can even appear to understand the issues before election and after election go back to their normal mindset and forget all they promised.

The government of my state has it in their minds that everything should be sold off and outsourced. My experience of a lot of outsourcing in the past say IT, is that the initial contract looks like you save money, but generally every extra thing required, every support call etc costs a fortune and before you know it taxpayers have payed more for some company to make a profit, services have declined as the company doesn't really understand what the government department is trying to do etc etc.

My state now is trying to downsize the public works infrastructure group as they say they should not be competing with the private sector. They build infrastructure like roads, bridges, rail etc. In many cases they aren't competing but essentially government wants for profit companies to do the work instead. So unless those companies are ultra efficient I'm finding it hard to see how they can achieve better results or less cost and make a profit. There was actually no mention of the costings, just that they believed the private sector should do it all and government should just co-ordinate.

All I see is excuses to blame someone else if something goes wrong, Divert more public funds to private companies (who no doubt give donations to political parties). Politicians are happy because once they leave politics they can approach these companies and ask for a job. Nothing is explicitly said or put in writing while this all happens but it is the expected norm.

So for the politicians it looks great. Someone to blame if it fails, claim look at what we did when in government, job opportunities out of government and when all the cost overruns happen, the debt (after revenue producing assets were sold to fund it) it is the next government's problem. So the cycle repeats until there is nothing left of public assets to sell (after they have sold off parklands and native wildland reverses to developers that will be the last to slowly go) then I wonder what they will do but raise taxes and increase debt.

Sorry I'm depressing myself and everyone just writing about it.
avatar
deonast: Well if we are off topic I think universally politicians are pretty much the same globally. They can even appear to understand the issues before election and after election go back to their normal mindset and forget all they promised.

The government of my state has it in their minds that everything should be sold off and outsourced. My experience of a lot of outsourcing in the past say IT, is that the initial contract looks like you save money, but generally every extra thing required, every support call etc costs a fortune and before you know it taxpayers have payed more for some company to make a profit, services have declined as the company doesn't really understand what the government department is trying to do etc etc.

My state now is trying to downsize the public works infrastructure group as they say they should not be competing with the private sector. They build infrastructure like roads, bridges, rail etc. In many cases they aren't competing but essentially government wants for profit companies to do the work instead. So unless those companies are ultra efficient I'm finding it hard to see how they can achieve better results or less cost and make a profit. There was actually no mention of the costings, just that they believed the private sector should do it all and government should just co-ordinate.

All I see is excuses to blame someone else if something goes wrong, Divert more public funds to private companies (who no doubt give donations to political parties). Politicians are happy because once they leave politics they can approach these companies and ask for a job. Nothing is explicitly said or put in writing while this all happens but it is the expected norm.

So for the politicians it looks great. Someone to blame if it fails, claim look at what we did when in government, job opportunities out of government and when all the cost overruns happen, the debt (after revenue producing assets were sold to fund it) it is the next government's problem. So the cycle repeats until there is nothing left of public assets to sell (after they have sold off parklands and native wildland reverses to developers that will be the last to slowly go) then I wonder what they will do but raise taxes and increase debt.

Sorry I'm depressing myself and everyone just writing about it.
Yea, lets stop, i got depressed myself
thank you and others for taking part of the discussion though.
Again, I think that most people aren't going to notice, but Double Fine sneakily put some GOG keys at disposition for all backers on their humble bundle account.

So if you are a massive chalice backer waiting for a GOG key, go get it !