Sheesh, the bad faith of some people....

This is gay porn as is clearly stated on both games' store pages: NSFW, LGBTQ+, FREE Adult 18+ Patch, etc...


Typically NOT what most people signed up on GOG for and have shoved on the main page!

I have to admit that this part of the forum rules was new to me. I'd also like to add that the "ignore" and "let the mods do their job" part would work much better if the mods would do their job better and finally start to moderate such posts in which people got insulted. I was called pervert just a few posts ago ... and I am expected to simply ignore it and tell the mod who would do nothing - as before ... (so far I found several posts in which buyers of nsfw games were caleld sick, perverts, pedophiles and worse and also showed those to a mod ... not a single one was moderated) does not really work well. So while I have to accept that these are part of the forum rules and you are obviously correct - I also have to say that I think that this is one of the more stupid rules GOG invented. WIthout community members reminding others of the forum rules I am pretty sure this forum would be even worse as it is already when it omes to insults and hate speech.

I think the problem with shooters is that they've been done to death (they were essentially the most popular genre to explore first-person perspective with) and the complexity/cost to provide even the most basic of offerings in that genre is high enough to make it less conductive to innovation.

I'll admit it is not the genre that excites me the most nowadays (nowhere close to how I felt about it in the 90s), but I still think the genre has the potential to go to places.

I get it. It's something that feels weird and unfamiliar. I grew up in the 80s-90s in North America. There wasn't a lot of that in popular culture when I grew up either and I'd be lying if I said it doesn't feel a little weird to see it in popular culture now.

Just remember that these are people that are that way and they can't change who they are. Just imagine how you'd feel if suddenly, people told you that being sexually attracted to women was wrong and now, only being sexually attracted to men was acceptable. That's what it is like for them.

I think the only feasible course of action is to change our perspective about it, but if they have zero exposure, it will never happen.

Yes, for the sake of roughly 10% of the population (I believe last I checked) and their friends and family, two men holding hands and kissing needs to be seen as normal (yes, here I'm focusing on a very specific part of the LGBTQ+ movement targeted by the game).

No worries I feel you.
I edited my previous response a little, sorry I was rude there no reason, lol

Well, it is a patch and you don't need to appy it so I doubt that these games are actual porn games. And I do agree, most people on GOG did not sign because of this stuff since back then it was not even available here. The question is if most of the GOGers would still sign up now that these games are here - and I am pretty sure that they would , since you still can get your games the same as before and all you'd need to do is to ignore whatever you dislike ... obviously this is too hard of a thing for some here. I really don't understand this. It is not as if they would show sexual intercourse directly on the front page. You get a pic of a game you dislike - nothing more. That's the end of the world or the end of GOG? Really?

The typical NSFW thread: 98% whatever, 2% posts about the actual game(s). The recent posts are more or less off-topic. It is still a thread about Synthetic Lover and The Symbiant.



Guess what! This store has different groups of customers. One group enjoys playing these games.

Sorry but none of these tags mean it's porn. To find out if it is, you would have to see for yourself or research it from some other source.

There are many titles in which, for hours and hours of entirely "work safe" content, there's one short scene where they show more skin than you would see on TV in the US of A. And these titles can be sold with some censorship / omitted scenes, because the exclusive purpose of said titles is not sexual arousal (see definition of pornography on wikipedia) and as such, you're not missing much if you play it with that one scene missing or censored. Hence why the optional 18+ patch.

It really would not make much sense to sell pornography that requires a patch to turn it into pornography. Why do you feel entitled to speak for everybody?

I signed up for DRM-free games, and am glad to see & buy DRM-free VNs too. Whether said games contain homosexuality or sexually explicit content was never a factor in my decision to sign up.

Once again, your argument of "if you dislike it, just f* off" is very considerate. thx dude, way to go

Also note that the front page doesn't feature these games anymore. There are lots of other games now...

One day of looking at games some people don't like. The horror... LOL.

Correction!... Because otherwise it gives the impression that you are possibly groping someone, rather than sympathizing with them or understanding them... :)
Don't like, or triggered by them (for their own personal reasons), who's to know ?...

Triggered by seeing GOG reaching a new low.

Instead of catering to their userbase which was made of PC games enthusiasts, by, I don't know, updating their unpolished DOSBox "ports", adding mod support, improving device compatibility etc. the site is going the "quick buck" way by shoving into our faces the latest trendy crap that sites like itch-io are full of

(edit: except that itchio actually has a functional search engine that gives you accurate results - unlike the vague, inaccurate and changing tags that GOG uses - and itch also doesn't require you to sign up / log in to download free games)

So reading isn't your strength? I said IGNORE, meaning allowing those who enjoy a certain genre of games their fun as well. All you have to do for this is to look the other way whenever you see a pic of a game you dislike . This has nothing to do with "f** off", it has to do with being tolerant for the needs and wishes of others as well instead of being egoistical. Sometimes I wonder how young the average GOG user really is ...

Why should I ignore the fact that a site that i loved and have supported financially for almost 15 years (just as you, signed up in 2009) is completely ignoring its stated mission?

Let CDPR create a [Removed. Official warning.] page and put its "indie" shovelware there and keep GOG focused on.... good games?

You sure do like your sex games, don't you?
Is "Inside Jennifer" a good game? Does it have the kind of content you'd expect from the title?

Then what should we do? be silent and tolerating every similar post?

What I was doing here is complaining about something bordering hate speech and saying that it even breaks the gog forum rules

You can put it in a balance and think about which one is worse, insults and hate speechs or someone complaining about it?

Too nitpicky from your part because you made the same regarding my post. Advising it was against the rules. With such interpretation of the rules you are trivializing intolerance, colective insults from the past and a potential hate speech

Have a N1c3 day