It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Maighstir: Pale Moon 27.3.0, and AF 1.8.0.

The console doesn't detect anything as an error, though there are a bunch of "Unexpected value parsing y2/x2/y1/x1 attribute." ending with "Relative positioning of table rows and row groups is now supported. This site may need to be updated because it may depend on this feature having no effect."

And no, it doesn't seem to be game-dependant.
Ah, Pale Moon....

Do any other features of the script work?

Let me test out the latest version in my Pale Moon install and see what's going on for me.
avatar
adaliabooks: Do any other features of the script work?
To be perfectly honest, I don't regularly use most of the features, and as such haven't noticed them missing, but testing out a few things now, it does seem that at many of AF's options are out of order in this environment. Click-to-hide-favourite-topics does work. Show-MaGOG-links, show-last-update, and show-full-reviews-automatically don't seem to work.
Post edited July 18, 2017 by Maighstir
avatar
adaliabooks: Do any other features of the script work?
avatar
Maighstir: To be perfectly honest, I don't regularly use most of the features, and as such haven't noticed them missing, but testing out a few things now, it does seem that at many of AF's options are out of order in this environment. Click-to-hide-favourite-topics does work. Show-MaGOG-links, show-last-update, and show-full-reviews-automatically don't seem to work.
You may need to use a different version of Greasemonkey then... I seem to remember that being an issue with Pale Moon where only certain features work..

But it all certainly works in my test version of Pale Moon (which I've just updated to the latest version 27.4.0)

Edit: This appears to be the version of Greasemonkey I use that works, at least judging by my posts in the AF thread when I managed to get Pale Moon working again.
Post edited July 18, 2017 by adaliabooks
avatar
Maighstir: To be perfectly honest, I don't regularly use most of the features, and as such haven't noticed them missing, but testing out a few things now, it does seem that at many of AF's options are out of order in this environment. Click-to-hide-favourite-topics does work. Show-MaGOG-links, show-last-update, and show-full-reviews-automatically don't seem to work.
avatar
adaliabooks: You may need to use a different version of Greasemonkey then... I seem to remember that being an issue with Pale Moon where only certain features work..

But it all certainly works in my test version of Pale Moon (which I've just updated to the latest version 27.4.0)
All right, I was the stupid one. Hadn't updated Greasemonkey for a while. Was probably still on the latest official one that's still supported in PaleMoon (1.something), replaced with the PaleMoon-compatible fork (based on 3.something), and it runs nicely. I was wondering why notifications (that's from BE though, isn't it?) didn't work earlier.

Sorry about that ruckus.
Post edited July 18, 2017 by Maighstir
avatar
Maighstir: All right, I was the stupid one. Hadn't updated Greasemonkey for a while. Was probably still on the latest official one that's still supported in PaleMoon (1.something), replaced with the PaleMoon-compatible fork (based on 3.something), and it runs nicely. I was wondering why notifications (that's from BE though, isn't it?) didn't work earlier.
Yeah, Pale Moon doesn't play nicely with most Greasemonkey versions and that fork is the only one I found that works at all.

Notifications is BE, but it may rely on some of the same things my script does that needs the newer Greasemonkey.

Glad it's working again :)

And I'll stop derailing this thread XD
avatar
Hickory: Then they're not classic installers.
avatar
JMich: Why? The difference between Galaxy installers and Classic installers is that Galaxy installers also include Galaxy with them. Classic installers do not, that doesn't mean games installed through Classic installers cannot use Galaxy.
Again, take a game that doesn't have a Galaxy installer and hasn't had its installer updated in the last month. When it's done installing, it will register itself with Galaxy. Does that mean that the older installers are not Classic installers either, but Galaxy installers were the default even 6 months back?
That's not how I see classic installers. Classic installers, in my opinion, know nothing about Galaxy. They have no business knowing anything about Galaxy. That's why they're 'classic' and not Galaxy-based installers.
avatar
Hickory: That's not how I see classic installers. Classic installers, in my opinion, know nothing about Galaxy. They have no business knowing anything about Galaxy. That's why they're 'classic' and not Galaxy-based installers.
Your opinion unfortunately is just that, an opinion, not a fact. Classic installers differ from Galaxy installers only in that they do not have the files needed to install Galaxy packed with them, not that they do not interface with Galaxy.
A Classic installer will inform Galaxy about a game being installed, assuming Galaxy is already installed in the system. And that includes installers created before Galaxy installers became a thing.
Can you smell it guys? It's the smell of "OPTIONAL" in the air.Or was it my dog.... ? ;).Cheers
avatar
Hickory: That's not how I see classic installers. Classic installers, in my opinion, know nothing about Galaxy. They have no business knowing anything about Galaxy. That's why they're 'classic' and not Galaxy-based installers.
avatar
JMich: Your opinion unfortunately is just that, an opinion, not a fact. Classic installers differ from Galaxy installers only in that they do not have the files needed to install Galaxy packed with them, not that they do not interface with Galaxy.
A Classic installer will inform Galaxy about a game being installed, assuming Galaxy is already installed in the system. And that includes installers created before Galaxy installers became a thing.
They are being mis-represented as "classic" if they have anything to do with Galaxy. The whole reason people screamed for classic installers is because they don't want Galaxy. There's no other reason for them if they're going to integrate with Galaxy anyway.
avatar
JMich: Why? The difference between Galaxy installers and Classic installers is that Galaxy installers also include Galaxy with them. Classic installers do not, that doesn't mean games installed through Classic installers cannot use Galaxy.
Again, take a game that doesn't have a Galaxy installer and hasn't had its installer updated in the last month. When it's done installing, it will register itself with Galaxy. Does that mean that the older installers are not Classic installers either, but Galaxy installers were the default even 6 months back?
avatar
Hickory: That's not how I see classic installers. Classic installers, in my opinion, know nothing about Galaxy. They have no business knowing anything about Galaxy. That's why they're 'classic' and not Galaxy-based installers.
Unfortunately Galaxy DLLs and such like have been bundled into games for quite a while now, before this update. Also, some of the folder structures are there for Galaxy regardless - Dragons Dogma for instance puts saves in a Galaxy folder.
avatar
Hickory: They are being mis-represented as "classic" if they have anything to do with Galaxy.
The previous installers also had stuff to do with Galaxy. So the "classic" installers are identical (possibly even to the bit) to the ones we used before.

avatar
Hickory: The whole reason people screamed for classic installers is because they don't want Galaxy.
Half a sentence here. They don't want Galaxy included in the installers. Missing part of the sentence is significant.

avatar
Hickory: There's no other reason for them if they're going to integrate with Galaxy anyway.
Because downloading 1000+ copies of Galaxy somehow makes sense when one wants to install Galaxy and games in 3+ machines.

Still, not going to argue whether Galaxy installers make sense or not, just stating that all of GOG's installers (for at least a year, if not more) would register the game with Galaxy, if Galaxy was already installed in the system.
avatar
JMich: all of GOG's installers (for at least a year, if not more) would register the game with Galaxy, if Galaxy was already installed in the system.
Yeah, a year. Very "classic".
avatar
Hickory: Yeah, a year. Very "classic".
The year is the time I am certain of. It could be even more (as many as 3 years, from back when Galaxy was announced), but I wanted to give a time I know as correct instead of one I think might be correct.
What constitutes classic is a different debate, as is what the installers should be called.
high rated
avatar
Hickory: They are being mis-represented as "classic" if they have anything to do with Galaxy. The whole reason people screamed for classic installers is because they don't want Galaxy.
They are not mis-represented in any way. Classic simply "as they were before", as in, before Galaxy installer was bundled in the "non-classic" installers, and that's exactly what they are.

If some peoples makes up their own definition out of thin air that their problem.
Post edited July 18, 2017 by Gersen
avatar
Gersen: Classic simply "as they were before", as in, before Galaxy installer was bundled in the "non-classic" installers, and that's exactly what they are.
Classic does not mean 'as they were before', not by any definition of the word. You are confusing 'classic' with 'classical'. They have entirely different meanings. Classic means timeless (judged over time) or typical of its kind.