Breja: There are whole threads, some running into triple digits of pages, full of high rated posts that harshly criticise GOG. And I assure you, no one cares about rep here, certainly not so much that they'd refrain from saying something for fear of downvotes. The highest rated users are usually the ones who have been here the longest and are most active and those people know full well how broken the rep system is and they have a real reputation on the forum, not some silly points. You're just salty because you tend to get downvoted for acting like jerk, which you're doing right now again - insulting people, some well respected community members, for no reason. Here, have a thread demanding GOG release devotion, full of high rated posts, many from users with four digit rep.
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/heres_a_message_from_a_real_gog_gamer_release_devotion/page1 Trust me, I've been salty several times on this garbage bin of a forum; I've even outright told several people straight to their face or via subtle snide remarks how their presence isn't welcome in my eyes. And apparently, I just never pissed off the wrong people. But yes; there is a hidden hierarchy. Every forum has one; even beyond the admins. Beyond simple ranks of trust, there are roles each user tends to get categorized into once they rise beyond the morass of infrequent people who haven't even changed from the default or whose first post is that they're leaving.
(And historically speaking, many admins had an internal and external pecking order; IE: If Breja was administrating a hypothetical subforum dedicated to Parades but went over to break up a slap fight in Ranger's Car subforum, the users would probably not listen very well to Breja.)
Course, as seen by this thread, parts of it have all the security that Miiverse did: Nontexistant.