Posted May 31, 2015
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/d7cfc9f01647fdd2e20bb0dd3487f1928ce949338e5e6f87f3a5a3f52b4c1de2_avm.jpg)
No, I doubt GOG could say that, as has been said before it'd likely be unprofessional to reveal they'd rejected a game because it's a rubbish bug-ridden mess or was poor value. It would also start a precedent of having to publically explain every rejection in future whenever demanded to do so, when they've never done that in the past.
The point I think you are missing is that it's not that people disagreeing with you are speculating up ways of GOG being right. Rather, it's that many of the pro-Hatred, "if you won't sell Hatred you are censoring us, bad GOG, boycott, boycott!" posts are jumping to massive conclusions and assuming that GOG must be in the wrong. That argument is total speculation and that's what's being pointed out to you.
You've no proof to support that stance and at the moment a good chunk of this thread reads as an attempt at emotional manipulation where the only right thing GOG can do in your eyes is to release the game here, regardless of the game's actual quality (which again, does not seem to be very good). The speculation and assumption is on your side and you're ignoring the many times people have pointed this out to you.
Thanks for the funboy, sounds like much more fun than fanboy :)
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/807e2b489031eb539bb8d6378116d45b1dc176936509c2a6bd4c8bb6a2244046_avm.jpg)
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/807e2b489031eb539bb8d6378116d45b1dc176936509c2a6bd4c8bb6a2244046_avm.jpg)