"Completely gone" might be a little bit exagerated. I am quite sure that the shop only sells games. The game in question can still be played in the 'original' offline version, so I don't see a refund happening anytime soon.
But hope dies last :)

Hitman GOTY, Witcher 3, and Cyberpunk 2077 all do indeed have something in common: namely, they all have/had singleplayer content gated behind DRM-gates.

Indeed it should; however, GOG need not do any major work to make that "downscaling" happen. All they have to do is to abolish Galaxy 2.0 and reinstate Galaxy 1.2 in its place, Galaxy 1.2 which is vastly better than Galaxy 2.0 is anyway, and also Galaxy 1.2 has a much more functional interface, and also none of the aggravating bloat that Galaxy 2.0 has (i.e. very annoying ads for "games that other people are playing").

Abolishing Galaxy 2.0 and replacing it with Galaxy 1.2 would be a very simple & cost effective thing for GOG to implement, and doing so would make GOG a lot better too.

Look up the definiton of "most of".
If after that, you still think you have a valid point to make, please explain which content of CP 2077 and TW3 exactly is "gated behind DRM-gates", and in which plane of existence that counts as "most of" their SP content.

You are the one putting up a big stink about the special qualifier that's necessary to try to untangle them. They are the same, differing only in magnitude/scale/size. The "most of" only serves to excuse GOG's errant behavior and attempt to rationalize the acceptability of the DRM; the "most of" is irrelevant unless you want to make things murky.

If I use certain words, I usually do so with a reason behind.
So when I use the words "most of the SP gameplay", I do that for a reason.
That you don't accept that reason as a means to differentiate between the games, is entirely on you.

There is a difference, one game had lots ot DRM, the other two have less.
They have something in common, they all have DRM.

You could say that The Witcher 3 is actually the worst because it now has more DRM than when it was first released :)

So DRM is OK up to 49% of the single player experience?
If 49% is still too much, when does it stop being OK? 20%? 5%?

GOG adding any DRM to a game is too much. I don't care about "most of" or "just a little" - there should be zero.

So you are advocating for DRM, but you seem to fail to realize that the addition of DRM is the one thing that will instantaneously kill GOG as an independent storefront. The DRM-free focus is the key thing that differentiates GOG from Steam, and (contrary to what you seem to believe) that's the primary reason that many of us are here. If everything became DRM'd on GOG, then there will be no reason to buy here vs. any other DRM store, and then at that point GOG will probably devolve into just another Steam key reseller. Why do you so strongly support GOG doing the one thing that will definitely cause it to lose its competitive edge and inevitably lead to its failure?

A bit disappointed I didn't get this survey but maybe it's because I don't usually voice negative feedback? Idk. Either way, I hope everyone who completed it gave pro-consumer answers, as you mentioned.

Someone linked it a couple of pages ago (if you have posts per page set to the maximum.)