I... don't know. I'd vote babark if only to remove a distraction, but I think razza is a better choice today.

But... I'm getting stronger Townie vibes from Joe now.

You think razza's feigning naivety and lying about having role results?

You're not counting babark's vote on Catte in post #813, or did you miss it because his reply is within the quotes? He affirmed it stands in post #816.



Colour me intrigued.


[emphasis added]

I have a bit of a hard time following the part I highlighted. Is "potential" a characterisation of "recent" or of "findings"? I'd think that if it were the former you'd say "potentially recent", so I assume it's about the findings? In which case, what exactly do you mean with "potential" here? Please, clear this up for me.


This Is another "I can't go into details", isn't it?


So. dedoporno thought JoeSapphire was hinting at being a Desperado and considering a shot at him, aka.he's got a town read on JoeSapphire.

@dedoporno, could you talk about how and when you landed on town read JoeSapphire? How confident are you in it?




Just to make sure I understand what you're saying here - if dedporno was scum, he'd never agree to the Dessimu NK because there were better targets, is that what you're saying?


Well, when I asked you it was around 9 pm your time, it's not my fault you spent all these hours editing your neked pics for dedoporno.


Am I to assume that you won't answer the questions I asked you about dedoporno and detective_razza in post #812?



You forgot that FrostburnPhoenix was the Town Copier.

Does this change anything?


Bleh, got distracted on the phone.

*refreshes*

It seems that the babark/JoeSapphire thing is concluded?

The thoughts I mentioned having on the matter is that it looks like the attempt of someone trying to figure out what happened that made his action fail while trying to not give away he's got a protective PR, and the latter resulted into him doing it in a clumsy, roundabout way that made the whole questioning look suspect to some. That's the feeling I have.

Yes, it's a bit over the top.

I don't count votes that are in quotes. Otherwise it is too easy to cast accidental votes when replying to someone. Post #816 doesn't contain a vote either. So no, babark's vote doesn't count. He'll have to cast it in an unambiguous way according to the rules.

I wasn't allowed to edit the post either, I blame the forum!

vote catte

Editing isn't allowed at all. As written in the rules. What you can do, when you notice such an error, is an 'edit by way of post'. I.e. you write a new post, either after 10 minutes have passed or someone wrote a bump post. In that new post you write the correction. That means you type what you meant to write, but this time correctly.

There is even another acronym for that: EBWOP (= Edit By Way Of Post)

Like this:

EBWOP:
I didn't mean to write quote books, I meant
unvote books

That's another abbreviation learnt, after the fact, then :D

This game has far too many inside baseball references!

This is a thought that had occurred to me as well. Oops, I started writing this hours ago and got distracted. But yes, "I targeted the dead person but it looks like I wasn't able to protect them." is a pretty text book claim for someone who went murdering and thinks they may have been observed. I guess I'll post this and see if there are any new posts made since.

Joe:
1 Dedoporno
2 HypersomniacLive
3 RWarehall

Dedo:
1. Catte
2. HSL
3. RW

ZFR:
1. HSL (/RW)
2. Ambitionz
2. HSL

AZ:
1. Razza
2. HSL
3. ZFR

RW:
1 Razza
2 Babark
3 HSL

HSL:
1. dedoporno
2. babark
2. RWarehall

Babark:
1 Catte
2 HSL
3 RW

too cowardly to play: catte, razza



SHOT:
dedo (twice), Catte (twice), HSL (once), Razza (Twice)

NOT SHOT: Joe, zfr, Babark, AZ, RW

VOTE IMMUNE:
HSL (six times), RW (four times), Babark (twice), AZ (once), ZFR (once)

NOT VOTE IMMUNE: Joe, AZ, Catte, Razza,


My brain is frazzled now. I think the data shows that me and AZ are the mafia so whoops. It's not me.
Catte and Razza didn't join in so they deserve a good lunch.
It's cute that AZ and zfr gave each other vote immunity but no-one else did. I hope they're the mafia.

I'll try and come back to this once I've eaten or something.

---

Sorry I never told you - game 68. Enjoy.

The Sun is racing across the sky Today. Is she really already close to the horizon again? A hot air balloon drifts by, chased by a German Messerschmidt. Which is now safe from flocks of birds because Sean Connery ... eh, Henry Jones Sr., is no more.

Official Vote Count
Joe 1 - Catte 808
Catte 1 - babark 846
Razza 2 - ZFR 738, RWare 776

not voting: Joe, dedo, Ambition, Razza, HSL
Razza is closest to Lynch at L-3

The Day will end in about a day.

wait- what? so babark has a protective PR? or is claiming to have one?
what’s the possibility of having more than one protective PR within town in one game?

Oh boi.

I want to vote babark now........

omg razza...


it's possible but it's not usual.

Babark is claiming to have a role which is usually protective, but didn't actually manage to protect Night One.

The way the role typically works, the fail-to-protect could have happened because of a mafia ability.

It's possible the role is a variation that isn't able to protect kills, but I'd expect Babark to have been told, and in that case it tends to be more damaging to town than useful, judging by mafiascum wiki.

Now that is an interesting question. Most of the time there's only one, but sometimes there might be a backup or something (we had a backup of sorts in the copier).