It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
JMich: There's a time and place for jokes, and a time and place for seriousness. And I'm not sure who is the German you are referring to ;)
"The JMich sense of humor is no laughing matter!"
avatar
yogsloth: "The JMich sense of humor is no laughing matter!"
Nice dodging. Or is it ignoring?
avatar
JMich: Nice dodging. Or is it ignoring?
Sorry, was there a serious question in there somewhere?

You realize everyone else's eyes glazed over in boredom about eight posts up, right? We're just making beeping noises at each other at this point.
avatar
yogsloth: Sorry, was there a serious question in there somewhere?
Yes. Why did you say I should invoke LAL if you didn't think wyrm was lying?
avatar
JMich: Yes. Why did you say I should invoke LAL if you didn't think wyrm was lying?
OK, now I'm ignoring you. LA LA LA LA LA LA. I CAN'T HEAR ANYTHING. LA LA LA LA LA.
avatar
yogsloth: OK, now I'm ignoring you. LA LA LA LA LA LA. I CAN'T HEAR ANYTHING. LA LA LA LA LA.
Feel free to do so. It's not as if you have anything else to put on the table.
Make a comment asking others to bloody their hands for you, then ignore them when you get called out. If I wasn't already voting for you, this would be reason enough to do so.
I see why adalia wanted me and HijacK to be quite :D
avatar
Leonard03: I see why adalia wanted me and HijacK to be quite :D
Congrats, Leonard, you killed the thread. ;-p

It did give me a chuckle. :-)
avatar
yogsloth: So you... were going to try... to get blamed for a vig shot you didn't take? How would you know the difference between that and a night kill? And why HijacK?

This sounds like one of those inadvisable Townie gambits.

This is where we do need JMich to pop up with a "Lynch all Liars" admonition.
1) Vig shot gets used, and so isn't a future factor to consider.
2) I'll know the vig shot gets used when two people die in the same night. You should have been able to figure this one out.
3) Hijack just happened to present an opportunity. It'd be a mite bit harder to set myself up to get blamed for getting so mad at someone like Cristigale that I'd burn a vig shot just for spite.

Ideally, scum burns their vig (if they have it) on Hijack, then tries to set me up to take the blame (since I all but stated I might do that). Scum found, vig found, act appropriately.
A townie might take a shot at Hijack, but he wouldn't then try to lie and blame me for it.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: 3) Hijack just happened to present an opportunity. It'd be a mite bit harder to set myself up to get blamed for getting so mad at someone like Cristigale that I'd burn a vig shot just for spite.

Ideally, scum burns their vig (if they have it) on Hijack, then tries to set me up to take the blame (since I all but stated I might do that). Scum found, vig found, act appropriately.
This is where I get lost.

HijacK presented an opportunity - but only for a vig? A scum vig? And then you would get credit for drawing it out?
avatar
Bookwyrm627: 3) Hijack just happened to present an opportunity. It'd be a mite bit harder to set myself up to get blamed for getting so mad at someone like Cristigale that I'd burn a vig shot just for spite.

Ideally, scum burns their vig (if they have it) on Hijack, then tries to set me up to take the blame (since I all but stated I might do that). Scum found, vig found, act appropriately.
avatar
yogsloth: This is where I get lost.

HijacK presented an opportunity - but only for a vig? A scum vig? And then you would get credit for drawing it out?
This probably doesn't matter at this point, but I'm confused as well...
Why was Hijack expendable?
What if town recognized that you had threatened to vig Hijack?
avatar
Bookwyrm627: 3) Hijack just happened to present an opportunity. It'd be a mite bit harder to set myself up to get blamed for getting so mad at someone like Cristigale that I'd burn a vig shot just for spite.

Ideally, scum burns their vig (if they have it) on Hijack, then tries to set me up to take the blame (since I all but stated I might do that). Scum found, vig found, act appropriately.
avatar
yogsloth: This is where I get lost.

HijacK presented an opportunity - but only for a vig? A scum vig? And then you would get credit for drawing it out?
How else COULD the scenario have played out?

avatar
cristigale: This probably doesn't matter at this point, but I'm confused as well...
Why was Hijack expendable?
What if town recognized that you had threatened to vig Hijack?
Think about it. If scum have the vig shot, then they are going to aim it at a townie; SOMEONE is going die unless the protective roles successfully intervene. How else could the scenario have played out?
avatar
Bookwyrm627: How else COULD the scenario have played out?
Scum recognize your threats. They vig kill HijacK. They don't say anything the next day. A townie also recognizes your threats, and calls you out on them. There is no vig claim.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: How else COULD the scenario have played out?
avatar
JMich: Scum recognize your threats. They vig kill HijacK. They don't say anything the next day. A townie also recognizes your threats, and calls you out on them. There is no vig claim.
Fair enough; I hadn't closely considered that one. At least objective 1 (get vig shot dealt with) would be completed.
avatar
JMich: Scum recognize your threats. They vig kill HijacK. They don't say anything the next day. A townie also recognizes your threats, and calls you out on them. There is no vig claim.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Fair enough; I hadn't closely considered that one. At least objective 1 (get vig shot dealt with) would be completed.
I don't see why it's so important to get the vig shot done. Also another possibility is that I was the vigilante and thought HijacK was scum and shot him. Were you so certain of HijacKs alinment that anyone who shot him must be scum?