It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
ZFR: You mean besides what I wrote yesterday about your end of day actions culminating in "Bookwyrm is not my buddy, so I vote for him!"?
avatar
blotunga: Well, you were the one accusing me of being scumbuddy with him, so that was the most obvious way to prove that I'm not.
Because no one will ever vote for his scumbuddy?

I'll grant you this though: I don't think now that he is your scumbuddy.

And Micro is suddenly fishy? Why?
avatar
ZFR: Because no one will ever vote for his scumbuddy?

I'll grant you this though: I don't think now that he is your scumbuddy.

And Micro is suddenly fishy? Why?
Because of:
avatar
Microfish_1: @MOD
Vote Bookwyrm


as he was one of Pooka's main suspects.
Pooka also "hated" Yog and didn't trust him enough to vote for him. BOTH ARE SUSPICIOUS.
Too quick, especially since Pooka's main suspect was yog and only in the late did he go on wyrm. Something smells fishy in this case.
avatar
blotunga: Too quick,
Too quick as opposed to what? Your vote? Because honestly that's the vote I see as "too quick", like pot, kettle something.

Yesterday when you were accused, your #1 concern was to prove your "innocence". It was close to EoD, but looking and voting for scum could go to hell; you just wanted to show everyone how innocent you are so you voted Bookwyrm. Today all of a sudden finding fishy characters is your main concern, so you immediately vote based on the first post you see????

As you said, "too quick".
avatar
Microfish_1: @MOD
Vote Bookwyrm


as he was one of Pooka's main suspects.
Pooka also "hated" Yog and didn't trust him enough to vote for him. BOTH ARE SUSPICIOUS.
Ha ha ha No.

Looks like you're trying to get the guy who was on the block yesterday back up there for another mislynch. You and your lies can go die. :P

Vote Microfish

avatar
blotunga: @Microfish: now hang on a second, I have nothing against voting Bookwyrm, but Pooka didn't get to track anyone even once.
That's a weird statement.
avatar
ZFR: Too quick as opposed to what? Your vote? Because honestly that's the vote I see as "too quick", like pot, kettle something.

Yesterday when you were accused, your #1 concern was to prove your "innocence". It was close to EoD, but looking and voting for scum could go to hell; you just wanted to show everyone how innocent you are so you voted Bookwyrm. Today all of a sudden finding fishy characters is your main concern, so you immediately vote based on the first post you see????

As you said, "too quick".
I didn't want to go down in the first day :D. I'm still innocent. And we have to start somewhere, if I change my mind, I will change my vote accordingly.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: That's a weird statement.
He was our Tracker, but he wasn't able to track anyone so any accusations made by him were based on the same thing as my accusations are right now, gut feeling.
avatar
Microfish_1: Noooooo, Pooka died :(
We shall revenge him!
Thighs is just terrible....juts terribly.

j So much scummy.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Looks like you're trying to get the guy who was on the block yesterday back up there for another mislynch.
Another?
K, that's not great. On the other hand tracker isn't the most powerful investigator, and as Dedo says now we don't have to have a whole thing about his "oh no I forgot to vote" thing.

Right now I'm worrying about Flub and Yogsloth. OverNight I was chatting to Trent about vanilla-confirming-vanillas and he said something which made me think I'd got the wrong end of the stick with what happened there:
Fellas, would it be a terrible idea for you to explain what went on? I was trying to let it go by without questioning yesterday, because I didn't want to give away more info than was necessary. Now after what Trent told me, I wish I'd pushed it further yesterDay. Everybody else - are you seeing something I'm missing there?
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Looks like you're trying to get the guy who was on the block yesterday back up there for another mislynch.
avatar
dedoporno: Another?
I was up for lynch on D1, and it would have been a mislynch (yes yes, of course I would say that). Micro looks (to me) like he is trying to put me back up there again for a mislynch.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: I was up for lynch on D1, and it would have been a mislynch (yes yes, of course I would say that). Micro looks (to me) like he is trying to put me back up there again for a mislynch.
Ah ok, so more like again rather than another. I thought you meant someone else.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: I was up for lynch on D1, and it would have been a mislynch (yes yes, of course I would say that). Micro looks (to me) like he is trying to put me back up there again for a mislynch.
avatar
dedoporno: Ah ok, so more like again rather than another. I thought you meant someone else.
Yes. Considering we haven't lynched any one at all yet, it is hard to have a second (or further) mislynch in this game.
avatar
JoeSapphire: K, that's not great. On the other hand tracker isn't the most powerful investigator, and as Dedo says now we don't have to have a whole thing about his "oh no I forgot to vote" thing.

Right now I'm worrying about Flub and Yogsloth. OverNight I was chatting to Trent about vanilla-confirming-vanillas and he said something which made me think I'd got the wrong end of the stick with what happened there:
Fellas, would it be a terrible idea for you to explain what went on? I was trying to let it go by without questioning yesterday, because I didn't want to give away more info than was necessary. Now after what Trent told me, I wish I'd pushed it further yesterDay. Everybody else - are you seeing something I'm missing there?
What do you mean bu vanillas confirming vanillas?
Microfish votes Bookwyrm, for a reason, but not flawless reason.

Blotunga votes Micro in response.

ZFR votes blotunga and gets in to back-and-forth with him.

Bookwyrm also votes micro in response to micro's vote.


Bookwyrm - how serious is your vote?

ZFR - you say "Willing to switch to yogs and Koro." how convinced are you that koro is scum?



avatar
blotunga: What do you mean bu vanillas confirming vanillas?
WELL okay, here's what I THOUGHT had happened:

Yogsloth: I'm not going to claim! blahblahblahblah
Flubbucket: Aha! I see what you are doing, you have proven to me that you are town vanilla unvote yogsloth

(something like that)

I thought somewhere in Yogs' "blahblahblahblah" he had made a reference to the town vanilla role PM.
For example, if his role said "POWER - all you can do is throw yourself on a grenade for your fellow town members" then when he said "I'll throw myself on this grenade" another vanilla would recognise it from his own PM and that would prove that Yogs is vanilla.

I assumed something like that had happened.

OH HECK I've just thought how STUPID I am. What's to say Mafia don't have the same vanilla description as town does?

Flub - from what you understand, is it possible that Yogsloth is Mafia Vanilla?

Have I got this all wrong?



So I was thinking out loud to Trent about what I think happened there and how vanilla-confirming-vanillas is a powerful thing and Trent mentioned that the PMs he's written are nothing special which made me think I was wrong about everything... which is possible...
avatar
JoeSapphire: ZFR - you say "Willing to switch to yogs and Koro." how convinced are you that koro is scum?
Just like I was yesterday.
avatar
JoeSapphire: ZFR - you say "Willing to switch to yogs and Koro." how convinced are you that koro is scum?
avatar
ZFR: Just like I was yesterday.
So yesterday wasn't just the best person to lynch with a looming deadline? You're quite confident in your read of him?