Unvote drealmer7.

Vote agentcarr16.

Well, I don't see it either. So without putting being Station Crew as addendum, I didn't claim right?
whatever all I wanted to say there, was that I'm right choice for repairing generators and that worked fine enough.
I won't be next one pressured into fullclaiming right now, scum has enough info as it is, I think.
But if that's what krypsyn is trying here, have at it. I'm not able to defend very well in the next 10 hours though, since it's back to work for me now. (again, as it will be same time tomorrow)

But I hope I'll have time to answer any questions that may arise when coming home before falling into bed sleeping (like I did today).

...

Precisely the sort of non-helpful response I would have figured to come from you. I do actually want to know why you find it to be false though, so any answer you are willing to provide at any point would be appreciated, it could prove helpful. If you don't want to be helpful in trying to discern who the intruders are, well, yeah, no surprise I suppose.

I thought it was hanged on a comma...

Maybe you can clarify for me? Are you voting for him simply because he shared PM information from the A.I., or are you voting for him because, with that information you are able to discern he is an intruder. If you are able to discern that he is an intruder with that information, could you please tell us why so the rest of us can make a more informed decision? Or what?

Heh.

I bet.

There's more to it than the list Krypsyn linked. And I am not going to make this a game about PMs

Oh, indeed.

Vote mchack.

Okay then if there is more to it, please share it.

Vitek seems to have picked up on it too. There should be no harm in sharing whatever factors there are that have made you go to vote this way if he is in fact an intruder and you did in fact pick up on discrepancies or off-behavior from him.

A bunch of "ah, yes!" and "oh!! yeah!" from varying people highly suspicious in my view. "oh, indeed!" WHAT exactly? Any of you voting mchack, please, enlighten the rest of us.

To be fair, that's exactly what it is right now.

It's against the rules to directly quote my PM. I told you that which I thought was necessary, and I'll be quite honest in saying that I'm not paraphrasing my entire PM.

Sorry, I was intending to point out that my claim is confirmable. If I had claimed Vanilla, then it would be a real waste of the cop's time to investigate me. As I have a role, it's not quite as much of a waste.

I suppose it wasn't necessary, but I think it strengthened the effect of the entire post, which was what I was aiming for.

So besides my meta, why are you voting for me?

I'm with trentonlf on this, but thatt's enough for me to vote mchack for now.

I'm hoping that they simply don't see the importance of it...

@ everyone else - Is it likely that this'll be useful later in the game? If not, we might as well share...


@ Q.U.A.D. - Votecount please

Sadly I know :-(

@drealmer7, my suspicions of him started early on in this post http://www.gog.com/forum/general/forum_mafia_31_crisis_at_space_station_epsilon/post187. Was a very scummy play on his part.

I find it much more enlightening to see who gets it (or, at least, claims to get it) without help. I do have a reason, and, although it isn't certain, it is about as good as any Day 1 reason can get. Especially when added to my other concerns about mchack.

Which makes me feel a little dirty. However, at least it is about a claim, and the veracity thereof.

Then why do it at all? You're basing your defense on incomplete information, then expecting people playing a game of lies and manipulation to believe you.