Crewdroog: eww. so you are naturally just scummy?

Crewdroog: Why does me having the second to last vote on you make me looks scummy? I haven't read too too much, but last i looked you had a whole lot of votes your way. Are you acting like a cornered animal?

If you turn the vote on me, you and drealmer7, one of you will be the next to go, I guarantee it. LOL vote crew.

Ixamyakxim: Thank you for the post! I actually wouldn't turn the vote on you (as if I could!) - I find it poor form to lynch new players on the first day, especially when they haven't had much time to actually get into the game.

That was more of a general heads up just in case I am lynched tonight as, like you pointed out, I am quite close.

Crewdroog: If you turn the vote on me, you and drealmer7, one of you will be the next to go, I guarantee it. LOL vote crew.

drealmer7: I don't like your threatening tone, but I am figuring you are lacking sleep during this crisis. Don't get so defensive, I'm just trying to figure out who the intruders are, as we all should be. This shouldn't offend you unless you're an intruder or perhaps an innocent crew member getting accused of being an intruder by a good number of people. My little comments shouldn't garner such vehemence from you.

Krypsyn: She is too busy trying to be adorkable. I give her a B+.

flubbucket: I'd give her a D.................... =)

drealmer7: It's hard to discern, but I hear a lot of mumbo-jumbo that doesn't make any sense, it keeps accumulating, and so it makes me think the intruders are talking amongst themselves out in the open, using coded language and phrases to communicate information and intentions without the crew-members knowing what is going on. If I were able to break the code, I'd give more information, but now, I just suspect it could be happening based on what I've heard.

Crewdroog: I'd give her an F. Hate that gal.

Crewdroog: Sigh, I have been trying keep to myself tonight as I am very prone to react before thinking when I am tired, and Ixamyakxim's (holy heck dude, that name...) worked quite well and totally got my goat. My burst may wind up biting me in the butt later on, but who knows, we will see.

Krypsyn: No.

Krypsyn: Astute.

Krypsyn: That, and it was the same question. I figured it deserved the same answer.

flubbucket: It's possible there could be coded messages

Perhaps I'm too subtle.

flubbucket: Perhaps I'm too subtle.

mchack: If not or it gets somehow proven that it was indeed a lie, I'll be pushing for lynch all liars.

drealmer7: Thanks, I was uncertain, actually. This leads me more down the path of the no-lynch option and more to the mentality of "those who are really against it are more likely intruders." So, who here is ABSOLUTELY against not eliminating someone today? I know a few have spoken out against such, are there others willing to reveal their position? Or are the intruders succeeding in their fear-mongering and we have people remaining quiet but would vote no-lynch if they didn't fear the wagon or a slower accumulation of information (I mean, I assume we will learn SOMEthing after a majority vote of no-lynch, wouldn't we? I feel like Q.U.A.D. will have to give us something more and you wouldn't simply get a repeat scenario of day-1 minus 1-crewmember from the overnight elimination. That does seem pointless and I can understand why you'd just go ahead and vote for elimination to avoid that, but, how likely is that? I think people are just afraid that that might happen, and, again, any behavior out of fear is no good in my book.)

QuadrAlien: Ixamyakxim curses, loudly. "Then why are we gathered here?" he continues? "Yes, shouldn't we be in the security department, arming ourselves?" continues trentonlf.