RetroLinuxGamer: 1. I mean what GOG is selling you is the game, not storage space. Back in the day we went to the store and got both a hard copy (floppy disk or CD, etc.) with the game on it. But then again, games tended to be more expensive, so I don’t have a problem with providing my own media.
Gigabytes are much cheaper now than back then. Also, to use another analogy: You might buy a product at the store, but you have to have the space to store it at home (or where ever you want to store). Truth be told, some times I’ve passed on cool things to buy because I know I simply don’t have enough physical space to store them or to store them without my house looking like a hoarder.
Yes, we own the games, but are responsible to find a place to store them, which I think is a reasonable compromise considering the price of storage space these days. I’d rather pay less $$ for a larger HDD or SSD than more $$ for a physical copy of each game. I can’t imagine so many games at only a few dollars if GOG had to ship them in the mail or rent a retail store!
So, we are not dependent on GOG servers beyond the initial download. But if we choose not to backup the games, frankly, that’s on us. Odds are GOG will one day fall. But that’s everything. Even countries.
2. Can’t you say the same thing about books? Can you own a string of text or blots on a page? It’s just information on an object. In the case of a physical book, the object is embedded with the information. In the case of a video game, the program is downloaded and run on a computer. And as another poster alluded out, even objects are just matter in some kind of pattern, like the pattern on an HDD or SSD that forms when you download a game.
3. You can say the same thing about vinyl, cassette tapes, VHS tapes or CDs. In the case of computers, they do change more often, but then again, we’ve got lots of emulators available too. So, if there’s any interest at all in old games in the future, and I think there will be, they’ll be playable.
4. As for the giveaway games, I believe that the terms are the same as any purchased games (please correct me if I’m wrong). So we own them just as much as any other games.
5. Yes, I do feel like I "own" GOG games as much as I can "own" any copyrighted program or artwork, especially given the lack of DRM, which would limit our options severely.
I also buy from Steam, but all things being equal (and I don’t care about "achievements", so put that aside), I prefer to buy from GOG because I know that I’ll be able to run the games even if GOG collapsed, as long as I’ve cared enough to download and backup my games, even though GOG doesn’t give us a Linux version of Galaxy and Steam has no problem supporting a Linux version of Steam.
ah no GOG/Steam or any other digital vendor is selling you a single use license (steam try to say they selling you a subscription) yea those (*&#^kers
anything digital is follow one single rule steal or be stolen this go's both way's for consumer and developer
it is long overdue that a more fair and realistic law comes for this but yea the world have a lot pressing issues and this not have the highest of priority's.
GOG=you bought a license from GOG (to download and use GOG service) basically it means you kind of illegal use the software *2.1*
Epic=you buy a license (but they kind of add a agreement that this is only used personal) and can't be settled in court.
as you can see the legality of all 3 stores are fuzzy and not really holding much ground in EU.
the problem is would a EU citizen go to court for a 20 Euro's game while it cost you like 4000 Euro's in court costs unlikely.