WinterSnowfall: I can certainly see why someone would chose to do so. I'm not going to boycott them, however, as long as they still offer DRM-free offline installers with no mandatory clients. That being said, I've long since stopped my "I'm not sure if I'll have time to play this game, but let me buy it here to support GOG" behavior, mostly because of the concerns you've also highlighted.
Time4Tea: At the start of 2020, I was taking the position that I would ignore sales and buy games at full price to support GOG. To say they have 'lost my goodwill' would be quite an understatement.
WinterSnowfall: I doubt anything is going to come out of this, of course, in terms of GOG doing anything to address your concerns, but just as a guideline on how to approach things in general, you probably need to define a metric here and be more specific. As far as we know, what is currently in place is already considered "adequate" by GOG.
Time4Tea: That one is a bit hand-wavy, I agree. I guess I would like to at least see some progress with the backlog of offline installers being brought into line with the Galaxy versions.
wolfsite: Just be careful with Zoom platform, it is like GOG a company and companies will in the end do what's best for business so they would also eventually do what is best to make the business grow.
Time4Tea: I think the problems generally start when companies go public, as opposed to 'companies' more generally. Anyone I buy games from over the internet is unavoidably going to be a 'company'. I am inclined to give ZP the benefit of the doubt, given they haven't done anything to betray my trust.
Moved from post #1, as it had apparently reached the max. character limit: People who are sympathetic to the concept: 1) DukeNukemForever
2) McMicroDonalds
3) WinterSnowfall
4) flanner
5) Dogmaus
6) Paliper
7) W3irdN3rd
8) FiatLux
9) MasterW
10) InSaintMonoxide
11) TheDcoder
12) shih1976
13) Djungelurban
14) Wishmaster777
15) Darvond
16) The_Puppet94
17) Zrevnur
18) DebbieL
19) jorlin
20) arrua
21) dick1982
22) viperfdl
23) tfishell
24) AgentBJ09
25) mm324
26) JackknifeJohnson
27) Lhun Duum
28) LukeHimself
29) paladin181
30) cyberfancom
31) BanditKeith2
32) GE0DZ
33) ReynardFox
34) N1c3_0n3
35) Lukin86
36) Illyrac
37) beiju_
38) Hollyhock
You can go ahead and add me to the sympathetic list.
Hollyhock: @Time4Tea:
please move my name from the "boycott" list to the "sympathetic" list. Thanks in advance.
Time4Tea: Done. Sorry for the slow response. I've just updated the first post list.
Magnitus: My take on the situation has been the following: GOG is GOG because Steam is already taken.
If the owners of GOG had the option to become Steam, with the market share and profits this entails, they'd drop their drm-free policy like a hot potato.
Time4Tea: This is so true, it hurts.
It doesn't help that a lot of the old guard of CDPR have been pushed out and replaced by soy shitheads, most of whom aren't even Polish. I'd imagine that's played a significant role in GOG's problems. Leaning on them to get people back in like the old guard and to kick out the pretenders would probably go a long way to fixing the state of things at GOG and CDPR.