Time4Tea: This boycott will continue until GOG is
free of DRM and
Devotion has been released ;-) paladin181: Do we know if the devs of Devotion even want to release here? Seems odd to include that as criteria for ending the boycott.
We don't even know if the developers of Devotion disclosed to GOG the reasons why their game had been pulled from Steam or if had GOG failed to do their own research about that before signing the release deal?
But lets be charitable and assume that developers did warn GOG about the problematic past of their game, then the next question is did GOG sign the release deal with the developers without having a meeting with the upper management of the CDP Group to make sure that everyone is on board to release that game despite the obvious risk to the entire CDP Group should CCP not stop at just blocking GOG from the Chinese market, but perhaps decides to ban all of CDPR's games in China on all platforms?
Quite clearly the only even theoretical chance for this boycott to get Devotion released on GOG is that the boycott is targeted against the entire CDP Group, but if the rest of the CDP Group had not given the chance to agree in advance to withstand any retaliation from CCP, is it really fair to force them to do that retroactively, especially as if they had had the chance to voice their opinions before the Weibo announcement, the release could have been done far more discreetly than by practically openly challenging the authority of CCP by using the Chinese social media to taunt them?
Unfortunately emotions about "CCP and censorship BAD!!!" seem to allow ends to justify the means instead of people trying to come up with any solutions that could be applied universally to any cases where a subsidiary has put their parent company in a harms way.
Now someone is bound to say that we should be given answers to these open questions, but to their dismay no such answers are likely to be given at least before someone retires and writes a book about their time in the gaming industry, unless of course someone in the know is stupid enough to make themselves unemployable in that industry before their livelihood no longer relies on it.
But in case anyone is still concerned about the developers being left penniless, my guess is that they had to have been paid off more or less generously because it would have been in CDP Group's best interests to make sure that the developers don't want to try their luck at taking GOG to court over a breach of contract as that might have resulted with it becoming a public knowledge that the rest of the CDP Group made GOG to cancel the release and regardless of if that was done with or without them having known about the release plans in advance, if was made clear who exactly we could blame for all this, a more potent boycott would have been more than likely than what we got by GOG being given and order to not say anything about the incident that wasn't approved by the upper management of the CDP Group, who made sure to let GOG take all the credit for the cancellation.
Sorry, but not sorry to bring all these shades of grey into to something so many here have so much wanted to only see as a black and white issue, but I am sorry that it took this long for me to realize that instead of trying to come up with a short and concise explanation about how corporations handle crisis management so that people would stop wondering why this boycott has been ignored, I should have just asked do we even know enough about the basic details about this fiasco to be able to determine who to blame and what would the be best course of action to take or if we even should take any action...