Krogan32: First, thanks for proving you don't know a thing about "strawman". Second, if my posts are irrelevant to you, then why do you keep replying? Anyways, I'll do you a favor. As you've already outed yourself, I'll just block you so you won't ever have to feel the need to defend that you feel irrelevant about my posts ever again.
To me that seems like weak troll tactics at best, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt yet assume that you will see this post.
Feel free to give it any name other than "strawman", but you were essentially making claims about my stance inconsistent with my own views.
I didn't claim that your posts are irrelevant to me. I claimed that whether your definition of boycott applies or not is irrelevant to me. If you've
actually blocked me because of failed reading comprehension, then that's just downright tragic, but it's ultimately your own problem.
I don't actually consider your recent few posts irrelevant because for once, you're trying a somewhat new approach, which means despite your rigid demeanor that the subject is brought ever so slightly further toward a sensible conclusion.
EDIT: Removed extraneous word that somehow snuck in there.