LiefLayer: I gladly do without it if it means being a fascist happy with an invasion of a free country.
That said, just read your comment to understand who has a brain and who doesn't.
And after all why amaze me, in the past there were partisans and those enlisted with the Nazis / Fascists in the republic of Salò. The resistance against the fascists. In the end, nothing has changed.
wodemao: You are correct, unfortunately you are the one defending neo-nazists.
Except they are not. The endorsement from the Ukraine goverment of far right movements like Azov has been purely utilitarisitc (they helped defend the borders from external aggression and russian separatists), but I don't condone it and I think the government should publicly neglect them and remove them from their semi-public status as part of the national guard.
That said, it's useful to remind to people that evidently were subject to internet misinformation and piloted propaganda spread on media and internet itself from Russia that far right movements have always performed miserably at the elections and people actually partecipated in public demonstrations against them several times. The president of Ukraine, Zelensky, is jewish. Volodymyr Groysman, former prime minister of Ukraine, is jewish.
Saying Ukraine is a country of neo-nazis is like saying Italy is fascist because of a bunch of Casapound idiots.
The reasons Putin is attacking Ukraine are mainly 2:
First, Ukraine is geographically strategic for Russia from a military point of view. If Ukraine were to enter NATO, Russia would have to defend a much larger border than they do now, in case Europe and US ever get nuts and decide to attack Russia (which isn't happening, Putin is simply paranoid).
Second, and most importantly, natural resources. Ukraine discovered in Crimea one of the largest sources of natural gas in the world, in the last few years. Which is why Russia occupied it in 2014. If they didn't, and Ukraine entered the EU, they would have had the resources to extract huge quantities of shale gas from Crimea and they would have been direct competition to Russia, whose economy shrunk considerably in the last few decades and that depend for about 50% of their whole GDP from gas exports.
Ukraine, having been kicked out of Crimea, responded by cutting the water supplies of the crimean peninsula, which has 'til then been suffering from lack of potable water, forcing Russia to spend a considerable amount of money. The objective of Russia is simply to gain full control of those gas resources and prevent Ukraine from eventually get them back if they ever happen to enter NATO and gain support from them to take back Crimea.
Don't be fooled by propaganda. This is 100% a war driven by money, greed and power. They want that juicy shale gas.
Mind that the very same arguments Putin is using now are those he used when they invaded Georgia a few years ago. Carbon copy. They said there were 2 regions that wanted to be recognized as independent and "asked protection" from Russia and used it as an excuse to attack. It's a propaganda strategy.
Unfortunately, nowadays, people seem to mistrust EVERYTHING. You post a video on Youtube, hundreds of people immedtiately say it's a fake.
Therefore, it's stupidly easy to turn the tables and convince them, especially the younger, more impressionable ones, that someone who is apparently a victim is actually the guilty part. Well, flash news: reality is very much more complicated than that. There is no "nice people" and "bad people". EVERY country made, and makes, morally questionable things. USA, Italy, Ukraine, Russia, you name it.
That said, and given that "let him who is without sin cast the first stone", in this particular situation Russia is very much in the wrong, no matter how you look at it.