Furyus: And yet despite the "DRM" and the 1 star review they'll play it for 200 hours.
realkman666: It's still valid information, even if you end up going through the hoops to play the game you bought.
What hoops, though? The single player has always been fully operational (including the DLC), and the multiplayer is being added. I wouldn't really call it "hoops", but rather features missing at launch. Not really pleasant, sure (I was not happy either, even if I'm more of a singleplayer guy), but they will cancel the main reservations when the last problems will have been cleared. Just like a game buggy at launch, but correctly patched since, would not warrant its "one star, doesn't work" critics anymore, no?
It would be valid info about the game at launch, but erroneous about the game as is. Reviews are useful for gamers that will think about buying the game in the future, so it's better if they are about the current state of affairs, rather than about the game's sketchy history, I think.
Edit : Hell, the "most useful review" is throwing at least one blatant misinformation, even if you only consider the day-one situation! (The "You can't save without an online account". A very serious accusation, and also very wrong : I had the game day one, I play as "guest", and I never had problems saving my campaign game. Otherwise, you would have heard my hissy fit across the atlantic)