It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
eRe4s3r: ...that are nowhere near under control
For nowhere near under control reactors, I find they display a remarkable lack of explosion "chernobyl-way". And that's utterly spitting on the efforts of the crews up there. Weren't they in action, the situation would be far worse.

3 years from contained? well then you might have better sources of informations than me, because I never saw anywhere in the medias that they where giving a schedule for "containing" the reactor (oh, it's 4 reactors in one power plant, not 4 power plants).
avatar
eRe4s3r: I had to giggle when some Tepco drone said that "disasters of such nature could not have been predicted" ... thats right, unless you read a history book that goes farther back than 80 years.
Well allegedly they were given a report a few years ago concerning such an eventuality,and measures which should be taken to prepare for it, which they ignored.
avatar
xa_chan: 3 years from contained? well then you might have better sources of informations than me, because I never saw anywhere in the medias that they where giving a schedule for "containing" the reactor (oh, it's 4 reactors in one power plant, not 4 power plants).
The only schedule I've seen mentioned, was a possibility of it taking decades to decommission nuclear plants. But IIRC it made no specific mention to that being solving the current problems as opposed to a general switch from nuclear power to other sources of power generation.
Post edited April 12, 2011 by bansama
Just gotta love all the BS being pumped or pimped by the media. Or is it Tepco? Or is it the government? Both? Aw hell! All of the above.
avatar
eRe4s3r: ...that are nowhere near under control
avatar
xa_chan: For nowhere near under control reactors, I find they display a remarkable lack of explosion "chernobyl-way". And that's utterly spitting on the efforts of the crews up there. Weren't they in action, the situation would be far worse.

3 years from contained? well then you might have better sources of informations than me, because I never saw anywhere in the medias that they where giving a schedule for "containing" the reactor (oh, it's 4 reactors in one power plant, not 4 power plants).
You are right, i meant 4 reactors ;) And only 2 are/were spewing if we be exact ;)

Imo, "under control" means its under control without people having to sacrifice themselves. If they stop cooling now you got reactors going critical (+ the water basins with rods) + leaks and cracks everywhere, not really "under control" imo. Also you didn't get my point,i meant this "level" raise is a PR gag, it is not a Chernobyl level of catastrophe at all. And that is indeed thanks to those people working on these reactors.

Contained (imo) means that radioactivity is plotted properly in the exclusion zone. Contamination is complete, Rubble removed, diseased decontaminated, reactor buildings "covered", fuel rods from water basins removed etc. - The nuclear crisis is over, basically.

Do you disagree that 3 years is a decent guess for that? I think its a good guess... Although naturally i hope it is "fully over" a lot faster than that.

Anyhow, i mean no disrespect ^^
Post edited April 13, 2011 by eRe4s3r
avatar
RangerSolo: Just gotta love all the BS being pumped or pimped by the media. Or is it Tepco? Or is it the government? Both? Aw hell! All of the above.
You forgot foreign governments who'd like to profit off of Japan's misery. Can't stress that enough.
avatar
xa_chan: For nowhere near under control reactors, I find they display a remarkable lack of explosion "chernobyl-way". And that's utterly spitting on the efforts of the crews up there. Weren't they in action, the situation would be far worse.

3 years from contained? well then you might have better sources of informations than me, because I never saw anywhere in the medias that they where giving a schedule for "containing" the reactor (oh, it's 4 reactors in one power plant, not 4 power plants).
avatar
eRe4s3r: You are right, i meant 4 reactors ;) And only 2 are/were spewing if we be exact ;)

Imo, "under control" means its under control without people having to sacrifice themselves. If they stop cooling now you got reactors going critical (+ the water basins with rods) + leaks and cracks everywhere, not really "under control" imo. Also you didn't get my point,i meant this "level" raise is a PR gag, it is not a Chernobyl level of catastrophe at all. And that is indeed thanks to those people working on these reactors.

Contained (imo) means that radioactivity is plotted properly in the exclusion zone. Contamination is complete, Rubble removed, diseased decontaminated, reactor buildings "covered", fuel rods from water basins removed etc. - The nuclear crisis is over, basically.

Do you disagree that 3 years is a decent guess for that? I think its a good guess... Although naturally i hope it is "fully over" a lot faster than that.

Anyhow, i mean no disrespect ^^
no disrespect taken, but I hear so much crap from european and american medias and from people comfortably living thousands of kilometers away from the devastated area that I sometimes get a little ichy. ^_^ Sorry if I over reacted !

Of course the level raise is PR joke, because while raising the level, they immediately add that the situation is fare from being as bad as the chernobyl one. Then, when raising it to the level that has been specifically designed to describe the chernobyl catastrophe?? fckn' politicial, always trying to save their sorry arses first...

The 30km thing is also a joke: it's done since day one!! I mean, yeah, the official "don't come" zone is 20km, but from 20 to 30 km away from the power plant, people have been strongly advised to leave sonn there's almost nobody left there! Once again it's just a PR stunt to look good.
@bladeofBG

My bad on forgetting them. Though I was trying hard to do just that.

I've haven't seen this much flip flopping since the ending days of Bush to the starting days of Obama.
It seems systemic to nuclear disasters that governments never tell the whole truth. Maybe because the government doesn't know the whole truth as it relies on information from the companies running those very same nuclear reactors. And outside experts can not possibly grasp a complex structure like a nuclear reactor without a lot of effort and time, which is why the "real" scandal often only comes out years later when the people responsible can no longer be punished.
avatar
eRe4s3r: It seems systemic to nuclear disasters that governments never tell the whole truth. Maybe because the government doesn't know the whole truth as it relies on information from the companies running those very same nuclear reactors. And outside experts can not possibly grasp a complex structure like a nuclear reactor without a lot of effort and time, which is why the "real" scandal often only comes out years later when the people responsible can no longer be punished.
Governments rarely tell the whole truth on any topic, as far as I'm concerned. Most of the time, I found that it is because of some little "dirty secrets". In the Fukushima example, the power plant should have been stopped 1 month before the tsunami, but suddently they decided to keep it running for the next 10 years. Why ? Because dismantling an old power plant and building a brand new one costs so much money TEPCO (and the government that would have helped them financially) decided it wasn't worth the price. 99% of the time it goes smoothly and no one notice, the remaining 1% gives us Fukushima incident...

Few people are aware that the vast majority of japanese nuclear power plants are outdated and need to be replaced by newer ones (safer ones). The problem is that most of those power plants have been built around the same time so they should be replaced around the same time, which would amount to incredibly huge sums of money, the kind of money Japan doesn't have. So, Fukushima.
avatar
eRe4s3r: It seems systemic to nuclear disasters that governments never tell the whole truth. Maybe because the government doesn't know the whole truth as it relies on information from the companies running those very same nuclear reactors. And outside experts can not possibly grasp a complex structure like a nuclear reactor without a lot of effort and time, which is why the "real" scandal often only comes out years later when the people responsible can no longer be punished.
Don´t tell me you did not no that before?

You should watch more political cabaret shows like "Satire Gipfel", "Neues aus der Anstalt" and "Mitternachtsspitzen" (all German).
The worse the political situation the better these shows get.
It´s funny that the only media telling the truth are marked as comedy. So they remain free of real consequences, unfortunately.

Winston Churchill: "[In wartime], truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies."

Well, not only in Wartimes...
Post edited April 14, 2011 by dyscode
Theres a difference between knowing something and suspecting something. Just because I see an effect does not mean I know the cause. ;)

I am well aware of our German Satire shows, Neues aus der Anstalt is fairly famous as is the weekly "Heute Show" which you comes each friday ;) And am watching both ^^

In fact i wrote that exactly because i am well aware of what kind "stuff" is happening in Germany, the AKW Moratorium is the biggest farce we have ever witnessed. And thats not a minority opinion. Just 1 day before Merkel did her 180° turn she said "Our nuclear power plants are safe" - only to then come out and say, asked whether the moratorium meant they are not safe, that we can not call them unsafe, but have to make sure they are safe. The conclusion by the reporter, "so if we have to make sure they are safe, then we aren't sure they are safe right now?" ^^

And what happened to the ASSE II nuclear waste storage facility is the main reason population is by a majority against nuclear power (even before Japan) but as cynical as it sounds, this disaster has given the anti-nuclear movement a lot of push - especially after our gov had just "reversed" the "exit" from nuclear power and prolonged run times up to 15 years for old unsafe reactor designs) which had triggered a fairly large anti nuclear movement even before the events in Japan.

I just want to mention though, if you understand German you should take a look at the http://www.zdf.de/ZDFmediathek/ they have a very interesting "modern day" report about Chernobyl, called S-Bahn nach Tschernobyl (Video 28min)
Seriously, fuck this for a game of soldiers. Just had another fucking huge quake. It was registered as a weak 5 on the Japanese scale in our area which so far is one of the strongest ones we've had here (stronger even than the 7.1-ish ones we had previously).

It may have only been a magnitude 5.9, but the epicenter was in the neighboring prefecture. Thus making it far far closer to us.
That´s terrible. We´ve had tremors here before, very weak ones, but enough to make me leave the apartment for a good hour or so and be kind of paranoid about quakes because our architecture is not built to resist them. Even a weak earthquake would be catastrophic here, like it happened in Haiti.

I can´t fathom how nervewracking it must be for you guys. Stay safe.
avatar
eRe4s3r: Theres a difference between knowing something and suspecting something. Just because I see an effect does not mean I know the cause. ;)

I am well aware of our German Satire shows, Neues aus der Anstalt is fairly famous as is the weekly "Heute Show" which you comes each friday ;) And am watching both ^^

In fact i wrote that exactly because i am well aware of what kind "stuff" is happening in Germany, the AKW Moratorium is the biggest farce we have ever witnessed. And thats not a minority opinion. Just 1 day before Merkel did her 180° turn she said "Our nuclear power plants are safe" - only to then come out and say, asked whether the moratorium meant they are not safe, that we can not call them unsafe, but have to make sure they are safe. The conclusion by the reporter, "so if we have to make sure they are safe, then we aren't sure they are safe right now?" ^^

And what happened to the ASSE II nuclear waste storage facility is the main reason population is by a majority against nuclear power (even before Japan) but as cynical as it sounds, this disaster has given the anti-nuclear movement a lot of push - especially after our gov had just "reversed" the "exit" from nuclear power and prolonged run times up to 15 years for old unsafe reactor designs) which had triggered a fairly large anti nuclear movement even before the events in Japan.

I just want to mention though, if you understand German you should take a look at the http://www.zdf.de/ZDFmediathek/ they have a very interesting "modern day" report about Chernobyl, called S-Bahn nach Tschernobyl (Video 28min)
I `just´ happen to live in Japan ;D
Love those show, deeply and watch them, thanks to internet TV! :)

Yes," das Merkel" just hangs her nose in direction of the wind, last election in Baden-Württemberg (where I am from) had at least some effect. One good thing is that since the Moratorium 9 out of 17 nuclear plants are already powered down. Not for good but at least for some time.

And thanks for that link. I became really weary of hunting down all this news horrors about japan. Really funny it start with a introduction by S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
scary stuff!
http://www.zdf.de/ZDFmediathek/beitrag/video/1309866/S-Bahn-nach-Tschernobyl
Even if you don´t know German, it´d tells enough with the visuals.

best
Post edited April 16, 2011 by dyscode
avatar
dyscode: snip
Funny, I have all the STALKER games, haven't had a chance to play them for the moment, but since the Fukushima incident, I think I'll wait a little more before playing them...