Posted March 29, 2019
Ash_Housewares: I'm just wondering why SC got the free to play treatment while these two didn't. Warcraft 2 should be easily tweaked to play on modern PC's. Warcraft 1 takes Dosbox one way or the other it seems.
Diablo 1 should've gotten the free game treatment too, but I think there was more legal issues with that title than this one if I'm not mistaken?
The manual alone is really great to have though, I used to read it every once in a long while.
Starcraft 1 only got the f2p treatment because another product, Starcraft HD was coming out. In this case, there's no greater future product in the works for Blizzard to second-hand advertise, so they had no reason to personally do a single thing with Warcraft 2. Diablo 1 should've gotten the free game treatment too, but I think there was more legal issues with that title than this one if I'm not mistaken?
The manual alone is really great to have though, I used to read it every once in a long while.
Want to see another example? Warcraft 3 has been recieving patches because Reforged is going to be a thing. Things that can make the company money in the future are the things Blizzard invests in.
In this case, they have clearly stated that Warcraft 1 & 2 are not priorities to them, so they allowed GoG to have a go.
While the pricepoint is debatable (For me, this is worth the equivalent joy of the two meals I could have gotten out of the price), the logic behind their decisions is pretty clear.