Posted March 23, 2014
I've just bought Thief: The Dark Project, installed it, launched it, and set my video resolution and that all worked just great. It had my widescreen resolution of 1680x1050.
But when I started looking around at the installed files and saw a file named "!NewDark_note.txt", and I got a little worried. It reads:
"If you prefer to play original version over the New Dark patch, copy files from "BACKUP" to main folder and start the game with Thief.exe"
This was frustrating to me, because when I buy an old classic game, I want to play that old classic game exactly as it was, back then. I don't want replaced art, like models and textures (I can't believe this is even an option people consider). I don't want a new engine, I want the original game engine. I want the unadulterated working version of the game.
I do expect obvious, purely technical fixes, like:
- Installs on my modern OS and works without crashing all the time.
- Supports my screen resolution so the game is not letter-boxed, or worse, stretched disproportionately.
Other than that, I wouldn't want anything else.
Although I've known about GOG for some time now, I'm a new GOG user, and I really want to support it, especially over DRM services like Steam.
I feel that GOG should really release the classic, old games as vanilla as possible. And it's really annoying that I feel I have to read tons of forum posts and such just to try ascertain what experience I'm getting. I think this is a failure on GOG's part, and it should really be communicated much clearer than a scrappy readme text file, that I might not see.
So my questions are this:
- What exactly IS the default installed version of Thief from GOG's give you?
- If I copy files from "backup" folder, do I copy from "ddfix" or "no_ddfix"? And does that give me what I outlined above, a vanilla experience.
Please can someone make this clear for me.
I just want.
- The original Thief that...
- Installs on my modern OS and works without crashing all the time.
- Supports my screen resolution so the game is not letter-boxed, or worse, stretched disproportionately.
How can I get that?
But when I started looking around at the installed files and saw a file named "!NewDark_note.txt", and I got a little worried. It reads:
"If you prefer to play original version over the New Dark patch, copy files from "BACKUP" to main folder and start the game with Thief.exe"
This was frustrating to me, because when I buy an old classic game, I want to play that old classic game exactly as it was, back then. I don't want replaced art, like models and textures (I can't believe this is even an option people consider). I don't want a new engine, I want the original game engine. I want the unadulterated working version of the game.
I do expect obvious, purely technical fixes, like:
- Installs on my modern OS and works without crashing all the time.
- Supports my screen resolution so the game is not letter-boxed, or worse, stretched disproportionately.
Other than that, I wouldn't want anything else.
Although I've known about GOG for some time now, I'm a new GOG user, and I really want to support it, especially over DRM services like Steam.
I feel that GOG should really release the classic, old games as vanilla as possible. And it's really annoying that I feel I have to read tons of forum posts and such just to try ascertain what experience I'm getting. I think this is a failure on GOG's part, and it should really be communicated much clearer than a scrappy readme text file, that I might not see.
So my questions are this:
- What exactly IS the default installed version of Thief from GOG's give you?
- If I copy files from "backup" folder, do I copy from "ddfix" or "no_ddfix"? And does that give me what I outlined above, a vanilla experience.
Please can someone make this clear for me.
I just want.
- The original Thief that...
- Installs on my modern OS and works without crashing all the time.
- Supports my screen resolution so the game is not letter-boxed, or worse, stretched disproportionately.
How can I get that?
Post edited March 23, 2014 by daniel_carvalho
This question / problem has been solved by voodoo47