Posted June 03, 2011
dragonturtle
New User
dragonturtle Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From Canada
vindik8or
New User
vindik8or Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2011
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
vindik8or: QTEs are not gameplay, it is a glorified remote control for a DVD player, the only buttons being "Play the next 10 seconds of footage" and "Too bad you have to watch this junk again".
A proper game has rules and tools. A good game allows a player to strategise how they will use their tools to overcome obstacles and to adapt their strategy to changing conditions. QTEs are stimulus and response at the most basic level. You could train a dog to beat a QTE. There is no leeway for strategising, there are no tools. It is lazy designers distracting hamfisted, nitwitted fratboys with how much money they spent on animators.
curlyhairedboy: from what i've seen in the witcher 2, apart from the fistfights, QTEs are really only used to add interaction to what would normally be a continuous cutscene. there's no gameplay during those parts anyway, because without the QTEs you'd simply be sitting back and watching. A proper game has rules and tools. A good game allows a player to strategise how they will use their tools to overcome obstacles and to adapt their strategy to changing conditions. QTEs are stimulus and response at the most basic level. You could train a dog to beat a QTE. There is no leeway for strategising, there are no tools. It is lazy designers distracting hamfisted, nitwitted fratboys with how much money they spent on animators.
now i agree that it's annoying when a game has QTEs everywhere - spam attack at an enemy, get close and press the button that appears above his head is a popular iteration - but it seems to me that CDPR has tried hard to preserve player control as much as they can.
Adam192
New User
Adam192 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From Canada
Posted June 03, 2011
vindik8or: QTEs are not gameplay, it is a glorified remote control for a DVD player, the only buttons being "Play the next 10 seconds of footage" and "Too bad you have to watch this junk again".
Good thing TW2 is full of gameplay and the QTE sequences are short and simple and don't in any way detract from the former. They serve a very specific purpose and are used sparingly - to involve you in a cutscene and retain the interactivity of the game while providing something of a more cinematic sequence - I can think of the two exmaples that stick out, both during boss fughts and both very simple - the Kayran, after chopping off 3 of its tentacles swings a fourth on you and you jump on a stab it multiple times, all accomplished by following the on-screen prompts. The second example is during the fight with the dragon, when you stab it in the neck and backflip it in to the ground - in both instances there is no loss of gameplay, because we're being shown a sequence of events that could not be accomplished using ordinary gameplay mechanics - there is no jump button, for instance, so how do we end up on either of the two monsters in the first place? QTE's allow us to perform actions that are otherwise not capable during normal gameplay, they are merely a way of keeping us involved.
Now, I would like to see a fist fighting system outside of the QTE minigame - it wold be nice to be able to fight guards with your fights in the same way you fight them with swords - ie; fast and agile.
curlyhairedboy
goddamn boots!
curlyhairedboy Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2011
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
curlyhairedboy: from what i've seen in the witcher 2, apart from the fistfights, QTEs are really only used to add interaction to what would normally be a continuous cutscene. there's no gameplay during those parts anyway, because without the QTEs you'd simply be sitting back and watching.
now i agree that it's annoying when a game has QTEs everywhere - spam attack at an enemy, get close and press the button that appears above his head is a popular iteration - but it seems to me that CDPR has tried hard to preserve player control as much as they can.
vindik8or: See my above post: if your game has long-arse boring cutscenes, you should consider hanging up your GAME DESIGNER hat and definitely not taking up film making, because you're likely to make long-arse boring films too. now i agree that it's annoying when a game has QTEs everywhere - spam attack at an enemy, get close and press the button that appears above his head is a popular iteration - but it seems to me that CDPR has tried hard to preserve player control as much as they can.
twistedmelon5
Twisted Inside
twistedmelon5 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2010
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
I think the QTE's are largely pointless, why not just use fist fighting as if you didn't have a sword equipped? Like in the LaValette dungeon, you can break free and you have to punch the guards to death, I don't see why this couldn't be used in the fist fighting tournaments, just plain lazy if you ask me.
I don't really care about the other QTE's in the boss fights.
I don't really care about the other QTE's in the boss fights.
Garrison72
New User
Garrison72 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2010
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
QTE's are bad game design. They shouldn't have included them, at least not in the boss fights. There is no strategy involved whatsoever, just a lame Simon says routine.
Post edited June 03, 2011 by scampywiak
Maerd
New User
Maerd Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2010
From Canada
TerriblePurpose
Kwisatz Haderach
TerriblePurpose Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Canada
Posted June 03, 2011
Adam192: I can think of the two exmaples that stick out, both during boss fughts and both very simple - the Kayran, after chopping off 3 of its tentacles swings a fourth on you and you jump on a stab it multiple times, all accomplished by following the on-screen prompts.
This is exactly the kind of situation where I really dislike the QTEs. The kayren fight is mandatory. You must do it to advance the story. The QTE is, as mentioned above, nothing more than a Dragon's Lair mechanic which forces you to go through it again and again trial and erroring your way until you find the exact combination of button clicks and timing to get through*. The problem is this means there's only one way to get through this fight. it shouldn't be this way for an important battle like this. That's poor design IMO, since the player should be able to approach that fight in more than one fashion in order to overcome it. You should be able to use your witcher build's various talents, skills, and equipment to get through this. Not some scripted sequence of button mashes.
I don't mind the QTEs for side diversions like fighting or arm wrestling, but to have it applied to something plot-specific like the kayren fight is bad design.
*This does not apply the the 'elite' gamers that have can get through this type of thing on the first try. But for the regular Joe Gamer like me and many others, it's frustrating to have to do it over and over just to figure out what the devs are forcing you to do in order to get through this fight, rather than figuring out a way that utilizes your character build/abilities.
vindik8or
New User
vindik8or Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2011
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
vindik8or: QTEs are not gameplay, it is a glorified remote control for a DVD player, the only buttons being "Play the next 10 seconds of footage" and "Too bad you have to watch this junk again".
Adam192: Good thing TW2 is full of gameplay and the QTE sequences are short and simple and don't in any way detract from the former. They serve a very specific purpose and are used sparingly - to involve you in a cutscene and retain the interactivity of the game while providing something of a more cinematic sequence - I can think of the two exmaples that stick out, both during boss fughts and both very simple - the Kayran, after chopping off 3 of its tentacles swings a fourth on you and you jump on a stab it multiple times, all accomplished by following the on-screen prompts. The second example is during the fight with the dragon, when you stab it in the neck and backflip it in to the ground - in both instances there is no loss of gameplay, because we're being shown a sequence of events that could not be accomplished using ordinary gameplay mechanics - there is no jump button, for instance, so how do we end up on either of the two monsters in the first place? QTE's allow us to perform actions that are otherwise not capable during normal gameplay, they are merely a way of keeping us involved.
Now, I would like to see a fist fighting system outside of the QTE minigame - it wold be nice to be able to fight guards with your fights in the same way you fight them with swords - ie; fast and agile.
QTEs don't allow you to 'do' anything because you are not using an established range of controls for specific actions to get a certain outcome. You are simply following an onscreen prompt to activate a predetermined, prerendered result with no input as to the outcome.
To put on my own amateur designer's hat for a moment, there is a way I would have used existing controls to make the fight with the dragon not a QTE at the end. To start with there is a way to 'jump', either going to the predetermined points and interacting, or rolling. You could have the player go to a spot and time their interaction to leap over to the dragon. To add strategy to the scenario, you could make it so that just loitering at the spot is dangerous (flying debris, something?) you have to either dodge around and only reach the point at the right moment, or use your signs to clear the area. You could have some impetus for the player to use signs and take up time where they could miss the window of opportunity and perhaps have to keep fighting the dragon to make this opportunity arise again (rather than just LOL YOU DIDN'T PRESS IN TIME YOU DEAD). Once on the dragon you could use a new variation of old controls where you have to perhaps use your movement or rolls to keep your balance, or your attacks in certain spots to cling on, or your signs to stop her from doing certain actions, etc.
It would require more work on the designer's part beyond just writing an action script for someone to animate and figuring out which button that now has no relationship to its previously established action to make the Pavlolvian Dog on the other end of the game press, but dammit, people should have some pride in the job that I want to take from them. I may be alone in this (and as people by more and more into this crap, it seems to confirm my feeling) but I like to PLAY my games. Not sit around watching endless cutscenes, and definitely not watching endless cutscenes for little flashing icons to pop up.
curlyhairedboy
goddamn boots!
curlyhairedboy Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2011
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
scampywiak: QTE's are bad game design. They shouldn't have included them, at least not in the boss fights. There is no strategy involved whatsoever, just a lame Simon says routine.
but it seems whenever strategy COULD be put in, then normal, full gameplay was enabled. take, for example, the end of the kayran fight. take out the QTEs and you've got a cutscene where geralt swings on a tentacle for 15 seconds. there's no strategy that could possibly take place, because it's scripted.
now, immediately afterwards, CDPR gives complete control back to the player. it's the player who uses roll to dodge the kayran's rocks, it's the player who figures out how to run up the fallen stonework and get in close for the kill. a lazier set of developers would have just kept that sequence entirely in QTEs.
Garrison72
New User
Garrison72 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2010
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
The Kayren fight is pretty cool, up until the point it's scripted and with QTE's. There could have been a longer and more strategic battle involved, but they wanted to go with something cinematic, so we get Geralt playing ride em' cowboy. From a game design standpoint, I think this was a mistake. It's relatively small hiccup in a game with great combat though, so I won't belabor it.
vindik8or
New User
vindik8or Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2011
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
scampywiak: QTE's are bad game design. They shouldn't have included them, at least not in the boss fights. There is no strategy involved whatsoever, just a lame Simon says routine.
curlyhairedboy: but it seems whenever strategy COULD be put in, then normal, full gameplay was enabled. take, for example, the end of the kayran fight. take out the QTEs and you've got a cutscene where geralt swings on a tentacle for 15 seconds. there's no strategy that could possibly take place, because it's scripted.
now, immediately afterwards, CDPR gives complete control back to the player. it's the player who uses roll to dodge the kayran's rocks, it's the player who figures out how to run up the fallen stonework and get in close for the kill. a lazier set of developers would have just kept that sequence entirely in QTEs.
TerriblePurpose
Kwisatz Haderach
TerriblePurpose Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Canada
Posted June 03, 2011
curlyhairedboy: but it seems whenever strategy COULD be put in, then normal, full gameplay was enabled.
take, for example, the end of the kayran fight. take out the QTEs and you've got a cutscene where geralt swings on a tentacle for 15 seconds. there's no strategy that could possibly take place, because it's scripted.
now, immediately afterwards, CDPR gives complete control back to the player. it's the player who uses roll to dodge the kayran's rocks, it's the player who figures out how to run up the fallen stonework and get in close for the kill. a lazier set of developers would have just kept that sequence entirely in QTEs.
They could have designed that battle completely differently so you actually could use your skills/abilities/gear to overcome the kayren and had no QTEs there whatsoever. There's no reason you needed to have the 'jump on for a tentacle ride' cutscene/QTE. That wasn't necessary. As for the end of it, going up the ramp didn't need to have the cutscene occur right away. Why couldn't the player have actually tossed a bomb into the beast's maw to blow it up? Why the cutscene there?take, for example, the end of the kayran fight. take out the QTEs and you've got a cutscene where geralt swings on a tentacle for 15 seconds. there's no strategy that could possibly take place, because it's scripted.
now, immediately afterwards, CDPR gives complete control back to the player. it's the player who uses roll to dodge the kayran's rocks, it's the player who figures out how to run up the fallen stonework and get in close for the kill. a lazier set of developers would have just kept that sequence entirely in QTEs.
Maerd
New User
Maerd Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2010
From Canada
Posted June 03, 2011
scampywiak: QTE's are bad game design. They shouldn't have included them, at least not in the boss fights. There is no strategy involved whatsoever, just a lame Simon says routine.
curlyhairedboy: but it seems whenever strategy COULD be put in, then normal, full gameplay was enabled. take, for example, the end of the kayran fight. take out the QTEs and you've got a cutscene where geralt swings on a tentacle for 15 seconds. there's no strategy that could possibly take place, because it's scripted.
GrimTuesday.931
New User
GrimTuesday.931 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From United States
Posted June 03, 2011
I thought that the timed responeses were really underused.
The really jarring thing about the QTE's were that there were like, 20 of them in the prologue, and maybe three or four per chapter onward. It was uneven, and weird.
Instead of a "true" QTE where all you do is press a button, I think they should have done more like the dragon one in the prologue, where your camera is changed. This creates an interesting change of pace, but still leaves control to the player
The really jarring thing about the QTE's were that there were like, 20 of them in the prologue, and maybe three or four per chapter onward. It was uneven, and weird.
Instead of a "true" QTE where all you do is press a button, I think they should have done more like the dragon one in the prologue, where your camera is changed. This creates an interesting change of pace, but still leaves control to the player