DCT: Yes, yes but was it necessarily to bring that version up when someone was asking about just the PC and the PS1 version? I could understand if he was asking what version of Soul reaver was better but he wasn't all he wanted to know which of just these two versions is better, so there was no point to even bring it up.
Paradoks: Necessary? No. But I don't see why it shouldn't be mentioned since we are comparing different versions. Many people are not even aware of the fact that DC version existed (and the fact that for some reason it isn't even listed on Eidos website doesn't help).
Were not comparing versions for the sake of comparing though,we were comparing versions to help someone with a purchase and said person has settled on either Version A or Version B as those are the versions he can easily get.
It's like someone asking what computer version of Ultima 4 is better out of the Apple 2, C64, or PC versions as he is looking to get one and me saying "Well the Sega Master system has the better version of Ultima 4, but out of the versions you listed.."
there is no point to it as it's irrelevant to the question, yeah it brought to light the fact there was a SMS/Mark 3 port of Ultima 4 and while it is the best port of the game with the FM towns version being second(and hardly anyone know these versions existed) it doesn't help him in any real way and so was pointless and unnecessary.
I'm not trying to be rude or anything, I was just saying it wasn't necessary to bring up the Dreamcast port in this thread.