YES thank you for not wasting any more of my time. Okay, Let's break these breakdowns down:
Megabyte: Ok, lets break ths one down.
Gardegnome: The quality of an argument is based on the truth of its claims.
Megabyte: Where as your entire argument boiled down to a child-grade insult as I have stated before. I really dont know who is going to read much out of it after that. Again, you started and peppered it with "WHAAAA" and you say this? XD
What I said was based on specific anti-SJW behavioral patterns I mentioned in my statement. I didn't literally just say "waaaaa" with no qualifications. I elaborated substantially. I chose "waaaaa" to ridicule the hypocrisy of triggered reactionaries, pissily complaining about the acknowledgement of the devs' blatantly bigoted remarks, accusing "SJW's" of being emotionally-compromised in every other review. My argument "boils down" to a child-grade insult only if you repeatedly avoid addressing any of its core content and instead fixate on a conveniently context-wiped misrepresentation of the 1% of the overall text you've actually had a lick of articulable criticism for.
Gardegnome: You can whine that an argument isn't 'cool' all you want, but as a criticism that's basically a non-sequitor. The meaninglessness of this is compounded by the subjectivity of the term. Anyone can claim something isn't 'cool' regardless of whether they even honestly feel that way (which is a complication that doesn't matter when dealing with verifiable, non-feels based claims), and whether something is cool or not depends entirely on which person you ask.
Megabyte: Please see above... as that was not an appeal to facts, but to emotion.. that's what mockery is.
Mockery isolated of any factual basis is nothing beyond an appeal to emotion but again, I elaborated on the thesis insults I presented. I wasn't just shitting out baseless insults with no elaboration whatsoever, despite what you might
feel like I was doing, by ignoring the overwhelming majority of what I said.
Gardegnome: I didn't make the argument to entertain you or make you feel good about what you believe; I made the argument because anti-SJW's are hypocritical, emotionally-compromised idiots who deserve to be called out and ridiculed for their petulant stupidity.
Megabyte: I would say the same about SJWs and most activists if you want me to be perfectly blunt... but you dont see me being a child and literally yelling "WAAAAH" like its an insult.... and then getting butthurt when called out for childish choice of actions.
I'm sure you would, and I could certainly agree that most people in general who are passionate about politics have no idea what they're talking about, but that seems to just be a feeling we share.
Do you understand the concept of hyperbole? What "waaaah" means in this context is that anti-SJW review bombing is mindlessly petulant. If you people were actually substantiating your conspiracy theories and generally providing any reliable evidence to support the claim that virtually every instance of leftist criticism is completely unfounded screeching, I wouldn't make this accusation.
Gardegnome: I don't care what you subjectively
feel about what I said. I care about legitimately falsifiable criticisms.
Again, what
specific points do you disagree with in the argument I made and
why?
Megabyte: How about you went off on completely unrelated topics (puberty blockers? pedos? Who the HELL was even talking about this? and that was just galncing back). Your emotional tirade was funny, but in a very cringy way... you know, like an 8 year old on a playground, pullign random unrelated things to the point where you made no sense to what the hell happened here. I was trying to be kind telling you to chill and not say much else. You didn't want that fine. You made yourself out to be a jack-ass like so many who scream without an incoherent meaning behind the noise.
Happy now?
Thanks for taking the time to be specific. I know I'm a dick, but I do appreciate that.
I saw several reviews that expressed these sentiments, that have since been removed it seems. Acknowledging the BS of sourcing things you can't actually produce, I will concede that this was flying off the handle a bit and I can't maintain it lol. That said, I was also criticizing the devs these minion reviewers were defending. I've attached two images, one of a review that suggests something similar to what I'd seen before, and one screenshot of some of one the devs' ignorant, bigoted remarks. That said, I admit that I have no evidence to support the claim that there were reviews accusing leftists of being pedophiles, and therefore would recind that. The criticism of the devs still stands, however.
As I said before, it's only 'without coherent meaning' because you're ignoring all of the specific claims I made. You've fixated on a miniscule part of my post and continue to offer the same ad hom criticism ad nauseam.