Posted March 14, 2022
When I discovered GOG, I thought "nice" and I started moving out of Steam, since I believed GOG was the right way to go of no DRM.
But, since that happened and it's clear GOG is doing it's best to keep the mentality of respect to the customer and free-drm, including some close relation with CD projekt and Larian, and also some effort to keep mods and unnoficial patches applied to some titles, I have to critique the poor effort of Galaxy 2.0 towards the Linux.
First, of course the lack of native client. Not much to explain here, just regrets.
Second, we can even forget the first item IF GG 2.0 was a decent piece of software, which it's not, running it on wine is terrible, the software is not only based on .net it is also terrible consuming CPU doing nothing and with a terrible UI.
After these two points, it's clear GOG is not putting much effort into GOG Galaxy, it looks like they are only trying to make some kind of customer fidelity or whatever, not caring about their linux community necessities and I'm not even getting into the network multiplay, which by itself is a strong argument to go back to Steam.
So, for the record, I stopped my effort to migrate to GOG, the DRM is bad, ofc it's, and I'm never going to buy Activision, EA or Ubisoft again, but this is not enough to put off with this terrible piece of software called GG 2.0.
Stop being lazy and deliver a GG 3.0 with Qt, you don't even need to do a linux native if you do it right.
I really don't think I'm asking too much here.
And I did not even touched the Proton topic, it looks like Steam is doing more for Linux than GOG, so DRM is not that bad after all, when you look at the big picture.
End.
But, since that happened and it's clear GOG is doing it's best to keep the mentality of respect to the customer and free-drm, including some close relation with CD projekt and Larian, and also some effort to keep mods and unnoficial patches applied to some titles, I have to critique the poor effort of Galaxy 2.0 towards the Linux.
First, of course the lack of native client. Not much to explain here, just regrets.
Second, we can even forget the first item IF GG 2.0 was a decent piece of software, which it's not, running it on wine is terrible, the software is not only based on .net it is also terrible consuming CPU doing nothing and with a terrible UI.
After these two points, it's clear GOG is not putting much effort into GOG Galaxy, it looks like they are only trying to make some kind of customer fidelity or whatever, not caring about their linux community necessities and I'm not even getting into the network multiplay, which by itself is a strong argument to go back to Steam.
So, for the record, I stopped my effort to migrate to GOG, the DRM is bad, ofc it's, and I'm never going to buy Activision, EA or Ubisoft again, but this is not enough to put off with this terrible piece of software called GG 2.0.
Stop being lazy and deliver a GG 3.0 with Qt, you don't even need to do a linux native if you do it right.
I really don't think I'm asking too much here.
And I did not even touched the Proton topic, it looks like Steam is doing more for Linux than GOG, so DRM is not that bad after all, when you look at the big picture.
End.