Crassmaster: You're telling me that a country is so affected by the aftermath of a conflict that ended 50 years ago that they still can't manage to accomplish anything beyond being a global nuisance? They still can't manage to pull it together HALF A CENTURY later?
jamotide: Yes, because nothing changed since the armistice, they have been in a state of war since then, with the threat of annihilation looming over them. This is probably the only thing that keeps the military dictatorship in place. External threats, war and sanctions are the best thing that can happen to a repressive regime, because they can blame those things on a common enemy.
Crassmaster: Secondly, the entire West went to war with North Korea to stop a conflict that THEY STARTED. The entire globe is facing off with them now because of repeated action that THEY have committed. So let's not pretend that they're some poor little victim. Their current world position is 100% self inflicted.
jamotide: So just because they started the war they deserve what they got? I'd be careful with that rationale, or do you think the US deserves to have all of its cities destroyed and 50 million killed because they attacked Iraq?
I am not defending the regimes repressive and atrocious actions against their own population, but their foreign policy is entirely understandable. They are not the only ones keeping the tensions alive. Fore example when Israel wanted to make a deal with them in 1993, the US blocked it.
Yes, they face sanctions because the only other options available are :
1. Outright warfare.
2. Letting the bizarre family of dictators running the show do whatever they want.
Since both of those options are horrendous, sanctions happen. And sorry, that IS entirely their own fault. The Chinese have shown a willingness in the past to deal with them, but even they have backed away both diplomatically and economically because not even they know what the North Koreans will do next. NK has created their own isolation.
I said that the West went and fought a war that North Korea started. I said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about them 'deserving what they got', that was purely you in an attempt to sound dramatic. Had it been taken to the extent that they deserve what they get, they would have been entirely occupied and conquered. That didn't happen for a variety of reasons, but most in the West didn't support the attempt to do so in the first place.
Their foreign policy is ridiculous. They're essentially a national version of the 3 year-old throwing a tantrum in a toy store because mom won't buy her a doll. For years they got away with empty promises leading to them receiving food and machine parts. Eventually, the rest of the world stopped playing, but they seem completely incapable of evolving their own policy. And at this point, the benefits that sort of policy brings even the ruling family seems to be dwindling.
As for the 1993 meetings with Israel, meetings based on Israel trying to get NK to stop supplying rocket designs to Iran in exchange for food aid and help with some mining operations. It was just another example of NK using the threat of one thing to get something else. And yes, they were halted in one of the earliest examples of the US (and soon the UN) sanctioning NK for illegal nuke development. Again, SELF INFLICTED.