There's been a lot of discussion about the whole videogames vs food argument, and a lot of very passionate and opinionated people on both sides. Some claim that food is superior, some claim that videogames are superior. It's doubtless one of the major dividing issues of the industry. I've been thinking about this for some time, and I've come to the conclusion that we need both videogames AND food. You see, if one were to simply go with "food," then they would have a lot to eat, but would never have any fun. On the other hand, if one were to go with "videogames," they would have a lot of fun, but would surely die of hunger. You see my point? People need to stop starting flame wars about this.

We need both videogames AND food.

Not sure if there is a hidden giveaway or just trying to be funny.

Anyway, I'll respond as if the topic were serious and just say that both sides are wrong. Sex is superior always.

H57N-R79E-68B6-2ZZR

I just eat the video games.

+1
It's Blood. I didn't take it because I already own it. Cuddling is alright but it's not as satisfactory when doing it with strangers as sex :P

I don't actually need much food. I can live on 4 bags (100g) or rice a week if I spend all my money on games first.

when I read the topic title, I thought it would be the sequel to the "Man vs Food" series

Was it taken?

Indeed. Blood is game. Blood is food. Ergo, game is food.

Videogames == sex == food

That's just cheating.

It's not cheating, it's all about a right balance.

You can survive on very small portions of food. You can't survive on low portions of games.

Ahh, but a supporter of the food side of things would argue just the opposite.

It's a complex issue.

Well, see, this is why digital distribution will never take off. I prefer games that come with feelies such as as sandwiches and crackers. Or delicious, delicious, manuals.

They're both equally good.

What really matters though:
Beer + Pizza + Games = Let the good times roll!