Lone3wolf: If three religions that hate each other like they're siblings agree he was a real person, just argue on the semantics of WHAT he actually was (Prophet/Son of God/False Messiah) then there's got to be something in it. And I'm not even remotely religious, saying that... If pressed, I'll admit to a bit of Wicca, but on the whole, religion is a farce that belongs in the past...
I suppose.. It's just a bit suspect.
There were
two links provided by Faithful, which have now been edited, but the "proof" that was offered was "passerby" accounts well after the fact.
The only account that would've been written around the time of his death was an account of an earthquake. That's it, the account was of an earthquake. The rest that followed was pure hyphothetical drivel.
A lot that "proof" was from religious texts, although not Christian ones, but religious texts anyway.
I kind of forgot my point...
So, bah humbug?
Oh. And totally agree with you. Religion deserves to be left in the past.