It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
predcon: Debate should be done BEFORE making the list
http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-100-best-games-of-all-time-the-argue-scussion/a-2011040416401817048

Edit: Got the damn link working :P
Post edited April 07, 2011 by Typhoon45
avatar
predcon: Debate should be done BEFORE making the list, which would then be made up of the results from a consensus taken by a "majority rules" vote. That way, the complainants should all be satisfied with "your choices were outvoted by the larger part of the group, that's why they are where they are in the list, if they're in there at all".
I'm not arguing that but the games media enjoy telling us what to like so it's unlikely they will listen to a poll when they know better than us.

Anyway democracy doesn't work either votes would be dominated by the console fans voting for Halo and Gears of War.
avatar
Delixe: What's the point of making a BEST games list if not to encourage debate? Yeah some people will act like the person pissed in their cornflakes but if you are going to make a list like this expect people to get angry as everyone has an opinion.
avatar
predcon: Debate should be done BEFORE making the list, which would then be made up of the results from a consensus taken by a "majority rules" vote. That way, the complainants should all be satisfied with "your choices were outvoted by the larger part of the group, that's why they are where they are in the list, if they're in there at all".
It's the 100 best games of all time according to Gamesradar, so why would they need to "debate" on that?
On your top ten list is this opinion according to your experience with the games or everyones experience?