michaelleung: I have to do an
Extended Essay for my IB studies (I'm in high school), and we have to write it on anything we like that's not like porn and stuff. You know,
normal people things. So I'm either doing it about the RIAA, Abandonware, or Creative Commons. What should it be?
Aliasalpha: You could always combine them into one super essay, examine the principle of ownership in total rather than looking at any one specific area and argue the case from both a
& [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontological_ethics]deontological perspective.
Summary of both stances
Utilitarianism (AKA: Chaotic Good)
* One must act to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number
* Places public good over private good
* Possible harmful to minorities and individuals, sacrificed for the majority
* The ends justify the means
Deontological theories (AKA: Lawful Good / sort of Lawful Evil)
* It's about moral obligation
* It's about actions (not ends)
* Rejects acts that harm minorities, individuals
* Stems from Immanual Kant
* Opposite of utilitarianism
* "Do what is right, though the world should perish."
If nothing else, something like that would make a damned fine entry into a uni portfolio if the subject you want has any ethical component