greypatch3: Well, I understand now that it's not worth entering this contest ever again. Congrats to the winner this week and all; I have no problem with them, and I hope they get to pick up something cool. I do, however, have a problem with the fact that I played the game from beginning to end, wrote several paragraphs about the strengths and weaknesses of the title, only to find out I had just as much chance of winning as everybody else who wrote a review...and everyone else had the better sense to write a paragraph and get on with their lives. Again, no bitterness towards the winner, or any past winners...but why even offer people the chance to win something for a review if there's no incentive to write better ones, just writing more of them?
EDIT: The review was for ObsCure, by the way. Fun game, if you like survival horror stuff.
Indeed, that's yet a weakness of GOG, not only contest-wise, but the fact itself that some articles that are either of low quality, or are not even reviews (p.e. the "Price match" one for Arx fatalis- it's a heads up, not a review) can be found among the true reviews of a game. If I want to read a review of a game, I want it to be informative.
I hope one day in the (not too far) future they will have sufficient staff to browse through any new reviews and remove/convert into simple forum threads the ones which don't fit among real reviews.
Anyway, congrats to the winners! At least your reviews don't fall into either above named bad category.