It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Hey Goggers;

As many of you know, we announced on last Friday that we are going to introduce regional pricing for 3 new games coming up on GOG.com soon. Looking at the amount of reactions (over 3,500 comments at this very moment), it is obvious that this change is making many of you guys worried. We must have failed to clearly explain why our pricing policy for (some) newer games will change and what this means as a matter of fact for our PC & MAC classic games, which account for over 80% of our catalogue.

To be honest, our announcement was a bit vague simply because our future pricing policy is not 100% set in stone yet and we were just worried to make any promises before it was. You know, GOG.com has been growing quickly (thanks to you!), and the more we grow, the more we are worried to make some of you guys disappointed. This is why we were so (over-)cautious with our announcement.

We should have just been upfront about why we've made these changes and what they mean for us in the future and what we're planning. So let's talk. To be clear: what I'm talking about below is our plan. It's a plan that we believe we can accomplish, but while it's what we want to do with GOG, it may change some before it actually sees the light of day. Please don’t blame me for talking open-heartedly today and telling you about the plans and pricing policy we want to fight for and eventually achieve. The below plans aren't sure. The only guarantee I can give you is that we’ll do our best to fight for gamers while still making sure GOG.com as a whole grows (because well, we still want to be around 50 years from now, you know!). So, enough for the introduction, let’s get things started.

Why does GOG.com need to offer newer games at all?

We've been in business for 5 years now, and we've signed a big percentage of all of the classic content that can be legally untangled. There are still some big companies left we're trying to bring into the GOG.com fold, like LucasArts, Microsoft, Take2 and Bethesda, but what classic titles will we sign in the future once we have those partners on-board? We need to sign newer games or else just fire everyone and keep selling the same limited catalog. Either we bring you “not so old” releases from 2010+ or brand-new AAA titles, because these will become classic games tomorrow. It’s as simple as that.

Also, well, we want to expand beyond just classic games, hence the fact we have been offering you brand-new indie releases for almost 2 years now. Why expanding? Well, obviously, because the more games we sell, the more legitimacy we have on the market and the more likely it is that we can achieve our mission: making all PC & MAC video games 100% DRM-free, whether classic or brand-new titles.

To be straightforward (excuse my French):DRM is shit-- we'll never have any of it. It treats legitimate customers like rubbish and pirates don't have to bother with it. It's bad for gamers, and it's also bad for business and our partners. We want to make it easy and convenient for users to buy and play games; rather than give piracy a try. Happy gamers equals a healthy gaming industry; and this is what we fight for. Anyway, I am sure you well know our opinions about DRM.

To make the world of gaming DRM-free, we need to convince top-tier publishers & developers to give us a try with new games, just like they did with classic games. We need to make more case studies for the gaming industry, just like we successfully did back in 2011 with The Witcher 2. It was our first ever 100% DRM-free AAA day-1 release. GOG.com was the 2nd best-selling digital distribution platform worldwide for this title thanks to you guys, despite having regional prices for it. We need more breakthroughs like this to be able to show all the devs and publishers in our industry that DRM-free digital distribution is actually good for their business and their fans. And when I say breakthroughs, I am talking about really kick-ass games, with a potential metacritic score of 85% or more, AA+ and AAA kind of titles.

And this is exactly why we signed those 3 games we told you about last Friday. We believe those 3 games can be massive hits for hardcore gamers, that they can help us spread the DRM-free model among the industry for newer games and we did our best to convince their rights holders to give GOG.com a try. One of those games, as you see already, is Age of Wonders 3. We're planning more titles even beyond these first 3 soon.

Alright, but why is regional pricing needed for those (only 3 so far!) newer games then?

First of all, you have to be aware of an important fact when it comes to newer games: GOG.com cannot really decide what the prices should be. Top-tier developers and publishers usually have contractual obligations with their retail partners that oblige them to offer the game at the same price digitally and in retail. When they don’t have such contractual obligations, they are still encouraged to do so, or else their games might not get any exposure on the shelves in your favorite shops. This will change over time (as digital sales should overtake retail sales in the near future), but as of today, this is still a problem our industry is facing because retail is a big chunk of revenue and there’s nothing GOG.com can do to change that. We need to charge the recommended retail price for the boxed copies of the games in order for developers (or publishers) to either not get sued or at least get their games visible on shelves. You may recall that our sister company CD Projekt RED got sued for that in the past and we don’t want our partners to suffer from that too.

On top of that, you have to know that there are still many top-tier devs and publishers that are scared about DRM-free gaming. They're half-convinced it will make piracy worse, and flat pricing means that we're also asking them to earn less, too. Earn less, you say? Why is that? Well, when we sell a game in the EU or UK, VAT gets deducted from the price before anyone receives any profit. That means we're asking our partners to try out DRM-free gaming and at the same time also earn 19% - 25% less from us. Other stores, such as Steam, price their games regionally and have pricing that's more equitable to developers and publishers. So flat pricing + DRM-Free is something many devs and publishers simply refuse. Can you blame them? The best argument we can make to convince a publisher or developer to try DRM-Free gaming is that it earns money. Telling them to sacrifice income while they try selling a game with no copy protection is not a way to make that argument.

Getting back to those 3 new upcoming games coming up. The first one is Age of Wonders 3, which you can pre-order right now on GOG.com. The next 2 ones will be Divine Divinity: Original Sin and The Witcher 3. We’re very excited to offer those games DRM-free worldwide and we hope you’ll love them.

Still, we know some countries are really being screwed with regional pricing (Western Europe, UK, Australia) and as mentioned above, we’ll do our very best, for every release of a new game, to convince our partners to offer something special for the gamers living there.

And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!) The choice is always yours. All we are after is to present it to you 100% DRM-free. We are sure you will make the best choice for yourself, and let others enjoy their own freedom to make choices as well.

So, what is going to happen with classic games then?

Classic content accounts for about 80% of our catalog, so yes, this is a super important topic. We've mentioned here above that we can’t control prices for new games, but we do have a lot of influence when it comes to classic games. GOG.com is the store that made this market visible and viable digitally, and we're the ones who established the prices we charge. We believe that we have a good record to argue for fair pricing with our partners.

So let's talk about the pricing for classics that we're shooting for. For $5.99 classics, we would like to make the games 3.49 GBP, 4.49 EUR, 199 RUB, and $6.49 AUD. For $9.99 classics, our targets are 5.99 GBP, 7.49 EUR, 349 RUB, and $10.99 AUD. This is what we’ve got in mind at the moment. We’ll do our best to make that happen, and we think it will. How? Well, we have made our partners quite happy with GOG.com's sales for years - thanks to you guys :). We have created a global, legal, successful digital distribution market of classics for them. This market didn't exist 5 years ago. By (re)making all those games compatible with modern operating systems for MAC and PC, we've made forgotten games profitable again. When it comes to classic games, we can tell them that we know more about this market than anyone. :) Being retrogaming freaks ourselves, we know that 5.99 EUR or GBP is crazy expensive for a classic game (compared to 5.99 USD). We have always argued that classic games only sell well if they have reasonable prices. Unfair regional pricing equals piracy and that’s the last thing anybody wants.

What’s next?

We will do our very best to make all of the above happen. This means three things:

First, we will work to make our industry go DRM-free in the future for both classic and new games (that’s our mission!).

Second, we will fight hard to have an attractive offer for those AA+ new games for our European, British and Australian users, despite regional pricing that we have to stick to.

Third, we will switch to fair local pricing for classic games, as I mentioned above.

TheEnigmaticT earlier mentioned that he would eat his hat if we ever brought DRM to GOG.com. I'm going to go one step further: by the end of this year, I'm making the promise that we will have converted our classic catalog over to fair regional pricing as outlined above. If not, we'll set up a record a video of some horrible public shaming for me, TheEnigmaticT, and w0rma. In fact, you know what? Feel free to make suggestions below for something appropriate (but also safe enough that we won't get the video banned on YouTube) so you feel that we're motivated to get this done quickly. I'll pick one that's scary enough from the comments below and we'll let you know which one we're sticking to.

I hope that this explanation has helped ease your worry a bit and help you keep your faith in GOG.com as a place that's different, awesome, and that always fights for what's best for gamers. If you have any questions, comments or ideas, feel free to address them to us below and TheEnigmaticT and I will answer them to the best of our abilities tomorrow. We hear you loud and clear, so please do continue sharing your feedback with us. At the end of the day GOG.com is your place; without you guys it would just be a website where a few crazy people from Europe talk about old games. :)

I end many of my emails with this, but there's rarely a time to use it more appropriately than here:

“Best DRM-free wishes,

Guillaume Rambourg,
(TheFrenchMonk)
Managing Director -- GOG.com”
avatar
lunah: I hope GoG sticks to their guns on this one.

There have been many newer games that I have had to purchase elsewhere, but if they were available at GoG, and offered additional value such as lower price or more bundled extras than competitors, I would've purchased them at GoG. Most people buy products from wherever they can get the most bang for their buck, and an expanding catalogue of newer games at GoG will create more competition among sellers and give consumer more choices.

There are some people who are offended by the regional pricing that comes with the newer games, and they make their voices disproportionately loud. They complain about a few pennies difference in pricing on older games, but if they only walked out their houses once in a while, they could make up the difference just by finding loose coin on the ground.

The end result of having more choices of sellers from which to buy newer games is good for a competitive marketplace and favors the general consumer. The emotional let-down of a few loud and passionate ideological crusaders is worth the sacrifice.
avatar
Matruchus: And the market is not competitive since GOG is more or less a monopolist in the drm-free market.
The amount of people who only shop on the drm-free marketplace is small enough to have minimal effect on the overall gaming marketplace. The net result is still more competition in the overall gaming marketplace.

avatar
Matruchus: Same prices on every platform, same discounts at the same time.
I have never had to pay more than $20 for any game, including AAA titles within 6 months of release, because I always shop around and always have been able to find a store cheaper than the rest. So either one of us is lying or I don't really exist.
Post edited March 01, 2014 by lunah
avatar
adamhm: While the proposed "fair" local prices are a bit arbitrary, I don't think they are that bad considering that GOG eats the VAT rather than passing it on to us... if they were to charge us the US cost + VAT (assuming 20% VAT) then we'd be seeing $5.99 --> $7.19 and $9.99 --> $11.99 (which at current exchange rates would be £4.29 / €5.21 and £7.16 / €8.69 respectively).

The discrepancies in their conversion seems to be primarily due to GOG aiming for a X.49 / X.99 pricing scheme and rounding the prices accordingly.

While I don't like how unfair regional pricing generally is, DRM-free is a far more important cause than worldwide pricing IMO.
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: Until a few days ago, GOG.com would have disagreed with you quite passionately, and would have accused you of trying to rip off honest customers.
I strongly doubt that they would have disagreed that DRM-free is a far more important cause than worldwide pricing, for the reasons I stated in my previous post. They've also been very consistent over all the years they've been in business about their "main mission" being to promote DRM-free gaming.

Yes, they've been vocal about regional pricing being unfair, but their position on that hasn't really changed. What has changed is their position on allowing publishers to use regional pricing here... which is a compromise in policy they have made for the purposes of advancing their mission of promoting DRM-free gaming (which again, for the reasons I gave in my last post is more important than the pricing issue, and is also the reason behind almost every previous policy change they've made).
avatar
goglier: My English is not getting in the way here at all. The guy / gal I replied to was merely melodramatic, which I pointed out, probably too subtly for you.

And waiting for a price-drop before buying a game is still an option, you know.
avatar
hedwards: Perhaps, but I should remind you of Poe's Law.
Nevermore!
avatar
Piranjade: No. I'm here for DRM-free goodness.
I hate Steam's client and their automatic update system with a passion, and I'm sad enough that I "have" to use them for some games like Blood Bowl Chaos Edition. I really wished that AAA titles would come to GOG. And that wish seems to be coming true.
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: So you don't have a problem with people, for whom "DRM-free" wasn't the only goodness, and who are voicing their discontent, and wish GOG.com would stick with all of their core values like they promised they would do?
I'm not quite sure what your question is aiming at.
Me not agreeing with all of the criticism towards GOG allowing regional pricing doesn't mean that I "have a problem" with people seeing it differently.
I might be annoyed by some of the false information some people try to spread though. And also get the feeling that some of the people who are not only unhappy but downright angry with the changes feel that they con be sure that they are the majority. I don't believe they can be so sure of that.

Sure, people always want to get stuff as cheap as possible. But they wouldn't have gotten AoW III etc. cheaper in online stores, they just wouldn't have gotten it on GOG.

Edit: I forgot a word.
Post edited March 01, 2014 by Piranjade
avatar
JudasIscariot: (...)

Feel free to ask me anything regarding languages or bonuses and I'll try to answer to the best of my ability :D
@JudasIscariot: Do you plan to keep the additional languages really additional? I personally prefer my games to be in English and would hate to *only* have access to a German version. I'm asking because of all this GOG-goes-regional stuff going on at the moment... ;)
avatar
JudasIscariot: (...)

Feel free to ask me anything regarding languages or bonuses and I'll try to answer to the best of my ability :D
avatar
DoctorPirx: @JudasIscariot: Do you plan to keep the additional languages really additional? I personally prefer my games to be in English and would hate to *only* have access to a German version. I'm asking because of all this GOG-goes-regional stuff going on at the moment... ;)
Yes, that's why we try to have a separate installer for every version of the game instead of lumping all the language versions into one huge installer. For example, with the recently added German version of The Guild Gold there is an English language installer and there's a separate installer with the word "german" in the file name :)

Some games, due to their particular file structure, we can't separate into several installers. We either add a language setup menu item or the game itself has a language selector in the options menu of the game :)
avatar
DoctorPirx: @JudasIscariot: Do you plan to keep the additional languages really additional? I personally prefer my games to be in English and would hate to *only* have access to a German version. I'm asking because of all this GOG-goes-regional stuff going on at the moment... ;)
avatar
JudasIscariot: Yes, that's why we try to have a separate installer for every version of the game instead of lumping all the language versions into one huge installer. For example, with the recently added German version of The Guild Gold there is an English language installer and there's a separate installer with the word "german" in the file name :)

Some games, due to their particular file structure, we can't separate into several installers. We either add a language setup menu item or the game itself has a language selector in the options menu of the game :)
Ok, thanks for your quick reply!
avatar
Ace1rimer: Here is a thought GOG and Triumph... Do something amazing on March 31st 2014.... Change the way the industry and the world thinks and put AOW 3 out there DRM free and no regional pricing and see what happens.....
Now there's a case study for you..... don't you think?
Um... it's obvious "what happens." GOG gets bitchslapped with a lawsuit for breach of contract.
avatar
Ace1rimer: Here is a thought GOG and Triumph... Do something amazing on March 31st 2014.... Change the way the industry and the world thinks and put AOW 3 out there DRM free and no regional pricing and see what happens.....
Now there's a case study for you..... don't you think?
avatar
geminidomino: Um... it's obvious "what happens." GOG gets bitchslapped with a lawsuit for breach of contract.
I think you missed the part about "GOG and Triumph".
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: Until a few days ago, GOG.com would have disagreed with you quite passionately, and would have accused you of trying to rip off honest customers.
avatar
adamhm: I strongly doubt that they would have disagreed that DRM-free is a far more important cause than worldwide pricing, for the reasons I stated in my previous post. They've also been very consistent over all the years they've been in business about their "main mission" being to promote DRM-free gaming.

Yes, they've been vocal about regional pricing being unfair, but their position on that hasn't really changed. What has changed is their position on allowing publishers to use regional pricing here... which is a compromise in policy they have made for the purposes of advancing their mission of promoting DRM-free gaming (which again, for the reasons I gave in my last post is more important than the pricing issue, and is also the reason behind almost every previous policy change they've made).
The "main mission", as I understood it, was following their core values.

Abandoning one of their core values, and then saying "We still follow our (now reduced) core values" sounds disingenuous.
avatar
geminidomino: Um... it's obvious "what happens." GOG gets bitchslapped with a lawsuit for breach of contract.
avatar
silentbob1138: I think you missed the part about "GOG and Triumph".
Expecting a game publisher to do something "amazing" that sets a bad precedent (read "slightly reduces profits") for game publishers is like expecting the US Congress* from passing an anti-corruption law that actually has a chance of decreasing corruption.


*Feel free to substitute your favorite corrupt legislative body here.
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: So you don't have a problem with people, for whom "DRM-free" wasn't the only goodness, and who are voicing their discontent, and wish GOG.com would stick with all of their core values like they promised they would do?
avatar
Piranjade: I'm not quite sure what your question is aiming at.
Me not agreeing with all of the criticism towards GOG allowing regional pricing doesn't mean that I "have a problem" with people seeing it differently.
I might be annoyed by some of the false information some people try to spread though. And also get the feeling that some of the people who are not only unhappy but downright angry with the changes feel that they con be sure that they are the majority. I don't believe they can be so sure of that.

Sure, people always want to get stuff as cheap as possible. But they wouldn't have gotten AoW III etc. cheaper in online stores, they just wouldn't have gotten it on GOG.

Edit: I forgot a word.
Some people just don't like getting ripped off, and some people thought that GOG.com wouldn't do it, because GOG.com repeatedly stated that they wouldn't do it.
Post edited March 01, 2014 by Ichwillnichtmehr
avatar
silentbob1138: I think you missed the part about "GOG and Triumph".
avatar
geminidomino: Expecting a game publisher to do something "amazing" that sets a bad precedent (read "slightly reduces profits") for game publishers is like expecting the US Congress* from passing an anti-corruption law that actually has a chance of decreasing corruption.

*Feel free to substitute your favorite corrupt legislative body here.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think they would do it. I just don't see how this hypothetical mutual agreement could cause a lawsuit against Gog.
For shaming, just have a 10 second video of you holding up a sign that says "Steam is better."
avatar
goglier: From my point of view, GOG went into the race with *three* guiding principles:
- same price anywhere in the world
- DRM-free
- great service, a big part of it is getting games to run as good as they can on the supported operating systems (they cannot work magic and have quite limited resources here)

They have given up on the first one, wanting to strengthen the second principle significantly.
So there are *two* principles left.
As far as service goes, it is not what it used to be.

Back in the day, every game was patched to latest official version. It was written on the game cards too. That 's no longer the case. Many of the games are latest versions, yes, but some are not. And some games have an installer, which is not the latest version, and a patch has to be installed separately.

One can argue that this is how things have been for as long as PC games have existed. True. But when GOG started, they tried to always offer the best, latest version, and also made that one of their selling points, like mentioning it on game cards.

Also, historical GOG was always trying to offer the most complete editions of games, with no extra costs. Then they started to sell DLC.

And let's talk about extras. What used to be GOG's another forte was that they offered a bunch of extras with no extra cost. Like soundtracks, and stuff. With AoW3 this has apparently changed too. There's one basic version, and another version with soundtrack.

So I'm not sure which part of that service is remaining so great, at least when compared with what it used to be.

There are some things that GOG does well, for instance their installers are decent when compared with competition, like DotEmu's sucky installers. Also FLAC soundtracks were nice recent add-on, although they were not the first ones to offer those, but rather tried to catch up with Humble Bundle and others.