XmXFLUXmX: Wrong, some people are just lazy scumbags, why would some drug addict or violent criminal with no hope be against free food, free housing, free medical care, and all of the drugs and perverted sex he could want?
Actually, my mother worked in a prison teaching computer sciences to prisoners and believe me, the vast majority of prisoners want out.
You are over fixating on the 1%.
XmXFLUXmX: Why would you possibly want to salvage a child killer, a rapist, a pedophile, a serial killer, or the rest of the violent whackjobs? What possible gain is there for society?
They tend to have issues that set them back.
However, defining them solely by those issues alone is taking a dangerously tilted view.
And btw, most inmates are not killers or rapists and most killers & rapists are not serial ones.
XmXFLUXmX: If the murderer has kids, they will have the same genes that helped dad enjoy a life of crime and violence.
Actually, you're barking up the wrong tree if you want to make a case about genetic determinism.
I met my biological father at the age of 23 and except for some mannerisms, looks and a creative mind, we didn't have much in common.
XmXFLUXmX: What kind of economics? Marxist-Socialism? If you want a prosperous economy, you take care of the citizens, not the criminals.
Criminals are citizens that went off course at some point.
Some of them are sociopaths and should be behind bars for the rest of their lives, but most aren't.
They have the potential to live out productive lives, make friends, have a family and contribution to society in a meaningful way.
Btw, getting them all the way to adulthood was a significant social investment from a lot of people.
Their parents, for starters, but also the school system and health care.
The economic incentive to set them back on the right track is high.