It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
OldFatGuy: In today's age of credit card fraud, I've seen my purchase attempts turned down multiple times despite never being late EVEN ONCE on any credit card, bill, or whatever.

And I've discovered it will happen sometimes when a single "store" has multiple attempts at sales in a short period of time.

Well, GOG, if you provided us with a different GIFT CODE on each game of a gift purchase, we wouldn't have to make multiple purchases, back to back, just to get different codes to pass out to different people.

Please, allow us the opportunity to assign games to gift codes when we purchase. For example, if we purchase 10 games, let us say 4 will have separate codes, 2 others will be bunched on one code, and then the other four will be bunched on one code. Like that. We don't need to see any codes beforehand, just allow us to assign games to Code 1, Code 2, Code 3, etc. and make multiple gift purchases on ONE payment.

Thanks for reading.

OldFatGuy

EDIT: As an example, I just made two purchases here, back to back, and fortunately, the card took the second one. This is one of the things in common I've noticed on purchases denied. PayPal seems particularly sensitive to multiple purchases at the same place on the same day. I just got FarCry 1 and FarCry 2 for two different goggers, and it would've been so much easier to just buy ONCE and get two codes.
I asked about the ability to purchase multiple codes with one payment and I was told it's basically done as it is right now so that you minimize key resellers who pay with questionable sources of payment.
avatar
JudasIscariot: ... I asked about the ability to purchase multiple codes with one payment and I was told it's basically done as it is right now so that you minimize key resellers who pay with questionable sources of payment.
avatar
Trilarion: Maybe you could tell the guys that told you that the legitimate GOG customers are not feeling very comfortable with it. You could suggest them to increase the limit to up to five copies per purchase. Also you could propose to limit this to customers who already have a nice track record like 20 purchased games for their own or whatever. Would that rule out questionable sources of payment?

Btw. I could imagine that a smart key reseller writes himself a programm to automatically repeat the checkout procedure. Such a tool would even be useful for gifters.
Even with 5 copies, there is still the chance for abuse. Keep in mind, that for some banks (I am no expert on this!) it takes a while to register that something fishy is going on. If you have someone querying the bank with individual purchases, then it's a safer bet they'll step in before too much damage is done. Again, I am no banking expert and, yes, I know we have legitimate serial gifters here and it's awesome as hell but, unfortunately, there's too much of a chance for abuse if we allow folks to buy more than one game code at a time.
Post edited April 22, 2014 by JudasIscariot
The ideas the last 2-3 posts are bandying about sound like they would require storing information, which is something we don't do, other than the usual user related information.

As I said, I am not an expert on these kind of things and I don't feel comfortable discussing it past what I've already told you as I do not wish to accidentally mislead anyone regarding the multiple codes issue. I can recommend writing some site feedback about it, though :)

(Please note that the last few statements I made about this issue was something I was told directly : ) )
avatar
JudasIscariot: there's too much of a chance for abuse if we allow folks to buy more than one game code at a time.
avatar
MaximumBunny: And what if it was done on request to support? That they could create a special order for trusted users to do so, all on an individual basis?
Errrrrrrm I am not sure how top answer that question without appearing overly cynical regarding human nature :/
avatar
Tarnicus: I can purchase one copy of Blackguards for $45 but cannot purchase 10 games at once on sale at $1.50 each...this is a perfect example of 'the law'(or rule in this place) not achieving it's intended purpose. Given the amount of gifting on this site, it would be nice if GoG could figure out a solution to this :)
Look I know it's a PITA, all I can say is send us site feedback, please :)
avatar
JudasIscariot: The ideas the last 2-3 posts are bandying about sound like they would require storing information, which is something we don't do, other than the usual user related information.
avatar
Tarnicus: You store the information already of every game I have bought, gifted or been gifted, so it's already there somewhere :)
But we don't store credit card information :)
avatar
JudasIscariot: Errrrrrrm I am not sure how top answer that question without appearing overly cynical regarding human nature :/
avatar
Tarnicus: Thanks by the way for taking the time to respond to this interrogation :P <3
No problem :) Sorry for not answering some things but it's better to not give an answer than an incorrect one, especially when it comes to financial transactions :)
avatar
JudasIscariot: Look I know it's a PITA, all I can say is send us site feedback, please :)
avatar
Tarnicus: And thanks for the reminder that site feedback exists! lol Will do :)
You're welcome... again :)
Post edited April 22, 2014 by JudasIscariot
avatar
JudasIscariot: Errrrrrrm I am not sure how top answer that question without appearing overly cynical regarding human nature :/
avatar
MaximumBunny: Haha, so in short reps mean nothing, vast amounts of purchases means nothing, there's no such thing as community standing, and we're all equally scum just so that the system can be fair to everyone. Gotcha. :P
It's not that at all. It's just what metric do you use to determine that someone's trustworthy?

Sure, there are lots of ways one can state "This person is trustworthy, to me" but it's subjective. What objective method would you use to determine that someone is trustworthy?
avatar
OldFatGuy: I admit I'm probably misunderstanding again, but here are some things that keep going through my head.

Number one, you have to have an account to purchase here.

The codes you purchase here are good here, and nowhere else.

The codes redeemed must be redeemed here and nowhere else.

Soooo, you have every bit of information as far as each and every code ever sold is concerned. You can look up who bought it, and who redeemed it, when, etc.

And with that information it would still be impossible to tell who's abusing the system???

So, since it's impossible to tell who's abusing the system, but you suspect it is a problem, therefore, who would be the most likely suspected??? Those of us that gift often.

At every turn, serial gifters are treated as, and look suspiciously upon, as criminals.

I can't even put into words how bassfuckingackwards that is.
OFG, again, I said all I could comfortably speak about in this sensitive matter. I urge you and everyone else to use the site feedback function regarding this issue. I am sorry I can't be of anymore help :/
avatar
OldFatGuy: -snip-
avatar
iippo: Like Judas said, might be policy to prevent something like this: http://unknownworlds.com/blog/beware-shady-key-resellers-and-discount-steam-keys/

got costly to Unknown Worlds Entertainment.
Exactly what I was talking about :) Thanks :)


avatar
JudasIscariot: OFG, again, I said all I could comfortably speak about in this sensitive matter. I urge you and everyone else to use the site feedback function regarding this issue. I am sorry I can't be of anymore help :/
avatar
OldFatGuy: Yeah, I know, I hope you're not under the mistaken impression I'm angry with you, because I'm not AT ALL. Heck, you didn't even need to post in here at all, so I'm thankful for all the info you've provided.

My frustration is with more or less "the system" as a whole as it is, once again, another example of honest people getting treated badly because of the acts of others. It's just.... bassackwards.

But I apologize if my frustration appeared to be directed at you in any way whatsoever, as that was NOT my intent. You've done me so many favors in the past it would be hard for me to ever get have any justification for directing any anger or frustration at you.

EDIT: I see my post above said the word "you" in it several times. Sorry, that was pointed at gog dot com, not you Judas. Maybe that was what I did wrong. Sorry.
OFG, I know you weren't angry at me and I am usually pretty good at spotting the "general you" and "you in specifc" versions of "you".

No harm, no foul :)
Post edited April 22, 2014 by JudasIscariot