Posted July 21, 2009
I tend to find that if the game is good then i get absorbed in it and i don't notice the graphics at all. Even playing old games that haven't aged at all well, it doesn't matter if the game pulls you in.
though it does expose games that relied ONLY on graphics... those don't age so well.
I'm not sure i'd agree about the games that moved to 3D in the early days though. usually it was the GAMEPLAY that suffered in the transition, rather than the graphics.
I still think most N64 games look great. I'd happily play a lot of them. while i think a lot of the transitions to 3D at that time were a bad idea, driven only by bandwagon jumping... there is an undeniable "something" to 3D that draws you into the world.
Not for all games of course (chrono trigger rocks), but i found that time/generation was when i started getting drawn into the worlds that were created.. whereas a lot of the SNES generation was more about *playing* a game.
Can't think of a game i didn't enjoy due to only the graphics.
though it does expose games that relied ONLY on graphics... those don't age so well.
I'm not sure i'd agree about the games that moved to 3D in the early days though. usually it was the GAMEPLAY that suffered in the transition, rather than the graphics.
I still think most N64 games look great. I'd happily play a lot of them. while i think a lot of the transitions to 3D at that time were a bad idea, driven only by bandwagon jumping... there is an undeniable "something" to 3D that draws you into the world.
Not for all games of course (chrono trigger rocks), but i found that time/generation was when i started getting drawn into the worlds that were created.. whereas a lot of the SNES generation was more about *playing* a game.
Can't think of a game i didn't enjoy due to only the graphics.