Finally, something substantial to respond to! :)
N0x0ss: nmillar, PLEASE DO EXPLAIN TO ME : "I don't know where the accusations against N0x0ss or Vitek have come from; I guess I'll have to have a quick re-read to figure these out." WOULDN'T YOU BOTHER READING EVERYTHING IF YOU WERE SEARCHING FOR THE TRUE SCUMM ?
I have read everything; my point was that the cases against N0x0ss and Vitek were both weak; the arguments against them didn't really make any sense. As Gazoinks pointed out earlier on, the only thing people seemed to pick up on was that they were on the opposite sides of the lynch somebody / no lynch argument.
N0x0ss: Are you really torn between two people who really didn't post that much on the forum or are you just taking us for fools ?
"Am I the only one that thinks this sounds like scum complaining that the game favours town?"
You don't truly believe that, do you :) ?
A mafia member that is completely new to the game could have made a rookie mistake such as this, but as it is pretty clear that boct1584 has previous experience, then no, this is fairly unlikely. Welcome to the wild speculation of day 1.
N0x0ss: "Well, my arch rival isn't present in this game, so I'll have to turn to a lesser rivalry instead.
Vote ViolatorX. :D"
Your first vote isn't even justified and you seem to vote just to make it look like you're participating.
As you can see from my previous unvote post, this was an RVS (Random Vote Stage) vote - this has become a tradition in GOG mafia games. Me and ViolatorX have a bit of history in previous mafia games, so it's fairly common that we cast a "joke vote" on each other.
N0x0ss: Furthermore, you're an experienced player, i've seen your name in the previous mafia.
Not sure of the relevance, but yes, I've only missed one game.