Posted September 13, 2008
I think applying pressure (if that's what it might be called) this soon is not the right thing. LucasArts would be right, after just one week of the GOG Beta, to say 'GOG who?'.
We have to be patient. Support GOG in the short and medium term with the titles it licenses and when it has become a larger operation and known as well as Steam, then apply the pressure. All we're doing now is making LucasArts say 'Let's put out a $60 compilation if people want these titles, or let's put them on Steam for $14.99 each with no compatibility coding.
GOG is too new to stand any chance at all of getting LucasArts on board, in my opinion. Let's pressure to get the MIcroprose back catalogue along with the Sierra back catalogue from Infogrammes. That's a better target to aim at at this early part of GOG's life..
We have to be patient. Support GOG in the short and medium term with the titles it licenses and when it has become a larger operation and known as well as Steam, then apply the pressure. All we're doing now is making LucasArts say 'Let's put out a $60 compilation if people want these titles, or let's put them on Steam for $14.99 each with no compatibility coding.
GOG is too new to stand any chance at all of getting LucasArts on board, in my opinion. Let's pressure to get the MIcroprose back catalogue along with the Sierra back catalogue from Infogrammes. That's a better target to aim at at this early part of GOG's life..
Post edited September 13, 2008 by UK_John