Posted April 11, 2009
![avatar](/upload/avatars/2008/12/fb732982a8173b8a1b25a9eef31321324ce51209_t2.jpg )
![avatar](/upload/avatars/2008/10/1224611812318_t2.jpg )
And still these things only crop up after someone's actually bought the game, encountered the problem, and complained about it. Which means that buying games on release day is a risky business, unless you go and google for known problems with the game, since you won't find that information here.
Also, Kakihara, I think you have taken some of my statements a little too literally. I don't expect to get a refund from GOG, and I don't expect them to fix bugs in the original games themselves. I do expect them to inform their customers of known issues before they buy the games, and if there are major problems with a game, I expect them to take it up with the publisher. And I expect them to answer support tickets.
And regarding the X-axis flip bug, since I have never encountered another game where the flip option flipped the X-axis as well as the Y-axis, then the game fails to, as DarrkPhoenix put it, "function within parameters typical for other products of its type". I cannot imagine anyone feeling comfortable with a reversed X-axis, and I cannot imagine that the developers would think so either.
I agree that a list of major problems should be made available before buying the game. But I disagree with the fact that you feel that the camera controls should fall under the "function within parameters typical for other products of its type" banner. This is a small bug that does not render the game broken. It only prevents you from playing it with the exact controls you'd want. If all games gave you the option of customizing the controls and suddenly a game would come that does not give you that option and forces you to use a standard, unchangeable layout, that too could by some be considered as violation of the "function within parameters typical for other products of its type" clause (word used correctly?).