It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
klaymen: I too don't like Generals, it always seemed as an attempt to grab more cash from C&C fans by slapping a C&C label on a totally unrelated game (apart from the fact that it is a RTS).

And when I want some modern-era RTS, I'll fire up Act of War, that mops the floor with Generals, IMO.
Oh yeah, I don't understand why this game doesn't get more love, it actually FEELS like you're controlling a modern army - not to mention THE CUTSCENES. I mean, seriously, I hardly know anyone who knows about it and yet it got so many things right - if it was just the possibility to place soldiers on roofs...
avatar
Fuzzyfireball: I enjoyed RA3, nothing more to really say about it. It sure was pretty though.
RA3 wouldn't be a great C'n'C game ... BUT - co-op! I mean, seriously, on-line co-op made that RTS amazing
Post edited November 25, 2011 by Fenixp
avatar
klaymen: And when I want some modern-era RTS, I'll fire up Act of War, that mops the floor with Generals, IMO.
avatar
Fenixp: Oh yeah, I don't understand why this game doesn't get more love, it actually FEELS like you're controlling a modern army - not to mention THE CUTSCENES. I mean, seriously, I hardly know anyone who knows about it and yet it got so many things right - if it was just the possibility to place soldiers on roofs...
Ok, installing right now. I have this game for few years now and never try it.